Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 912

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: an audiovisual recording of a child’s statement admitted as evidence.

Children Data processing Evidence Youth

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, in any criminal trial or hearing, juvenile fact-finding hearing regarding a child alleged to be in need of protection or services, or a hearing regarding the revocation of probation or parole, a court or hearing examiner may admit into evidence the audiovisual recording of an oral statement of a child who is available to testify. Before admitting the recorded statement as evidence, the court or hearing examiner must conduct a hearing on the statement’s admissibility and rule on any objections to its admissibility.

Under current law, the court or hearing examiner must admit the recorded statement if the trial or hearing in which the statement is offered commences before the child’s 12th birthday or commences before the child’s 16th birthday and the interests of justice warrant its admission; the recording is accurate; the child’s statement was made upon oath or affirmation; the time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide an indication of its trustworthiness; and admission of the statement will not unfairly surprise any party or deprive any party of a fair opportunity to meet allegations made in the statement.

Finally, current law requires the court or hearing examiner to consider a number of factors to determine whether the interests of justice warrant the admission of an audiovisual recording of a statement of a child who is at least 12 years of age but younger than 16 years of age. The factors include the child’s chronological age and level of development, general physical and mental health, and capacity to comprehend the significance of the events being addressed by the court or hearing examiner.

Under this bill, the court or hearing examiner may admit into evidence the audiovisual recording of an oral statement of a child who is available to testify if the recording was made before the child’s 12th birthday or made before the child’s 18th birthday and the interests of justice warrant its admission. The draft also requires the court or hearing examiner to consider the factors under current law to determine whether the interests of justice warrant the admission of the recorded statement of a child who is at least 12 years of age but younger than 18 years of age.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Behnke (R) , Dittrich (R) , Franklin (R) , Goeben (R) , Knodl (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Rivera-Wagner (D) , Spaude (D) , Steffen (R)

6 cosponsors

Jacque (R) , Kitchens (R) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Ratcliff (D) , Subeck (D) , Wall (D)

Registered lobbying interests · 4

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Feb 4, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Franklin, Behnke, Dittrich, Goeben, Knodl, Murphy, O'Connor, Rivera-Wagner, Spaude and Steffen; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Wall

  2. Jan 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Jan 29, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 29, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  7. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  9. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Senator Ratcliff added as a cosponsor

  10. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:45 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  11. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Feb 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  13. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1