Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 972

Financial exploitation of vulnerable adults

Topics: Crime and criminals, Financial institution, Intellectual disabilities, Senior citizen

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 18, 2026, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 30, 2026

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 18, 2026

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 970. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows financial service providers to refuse or delay financial transactions when financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult is suspected. The bill authorizes financial service providers to take certain other actions to prevent or detect financial exploitation of vulnerable adults.

Under current law, upon receiving a report of alleged abuse, financial exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect of any person age 60 or older who has experienced, is experiencing, or is at risk of experiencing abuse, neglect, self-neglect, or financial exploitation (an elder adult at risk), the elder-adult-at-risk agency in a county must respond by investigating or must refer the report to another agency for investigation. Similarly, if it has reason to believe that an adult who has a physical or mental condition that substantially impairs his or her ability to care for his or her needs and who has experienced, is experiencing, or is at risk of experiencing abuse, neglect, self-neglect, or financial exploitation (an adult at risk) is the subject of abuse, financial exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect, the adult-at-risk agency in a county may respond by investigating to determine whether the adult at risk is in need of protective services. “Financial exploitation” includes obtaining an individual’s money or property by deceiving or enticing the individual or by coercing the individual to give, sell at less than fair value, or convey money or property against his or her will without his or her informed consent, and also includes certain crimes such as theft and forgery.

Read the full summary

Current law defines a “vulnerable adult” as an adult who is at least 65 years of age or who has a physical or mental condition that substantially impairs his or her ability to care for his or her needs and who has experienced, is experiencing, or is at risk of experiencing abuse, neglect, self-neglect, or financial exploitation. A “financial service provider” is defined to include financial institutions chartered under the law of this state and other state-licensed financial service providers such as mortgage bankers and brokers, money transmitters, and various types of lenders. Current law provides a process for a financial service provider to create a list of persons that a vulnerable adult authorizes to be contacted if the financial service provider reasonably suspects that the vulnerable adult is a victim of financial exploitation. A financial service provider may convey its suspicions of financial exploitation to the persons on this list and certain other persons. A financial service provider acting in good faith is immune from liability for contacting a person or not contacting a person to convey a suspicion of financial exploitation and for any action taken in furtherance of its reasonable suspicion of financial exploitation.

Under this bill, if a financial service provider reasonably suspects that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult has occurred or been attempted, the financial service provider may, but is not required to, refuse or delay a financial transaction on an account of the vulnerable adult or on which the vulnerable adult is a beneficiary or on an account of a person suspected of perpetrating financial exploitation. In addition, a financial service provider may, but is not required to, refuse or delay a financial transaction if an elder-adult-at-risk agency, adult-at-risk agency, or law enforcement agency provides information to the financial service provider that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred or been attempted. The bill requires certain notice if a financial service provider refuses or delays a financial transaction under these circumstances and establishes certain time limits applicable to the refusal or delay of the financial transaction. In addition, the bill allows a financial service provider to refuse to accept a power of attorney of a vulnerable adult if the financial service provider reasonably suspects that the vulnerable adult may be the victim of financial exploitation. A financial service provider is immune from liability for 1) refusing or not refusing, or delaying or not delaying, a financial transaction, 2) refusing to accept or accepting a power of attorney, and 3) any action based on a reasonable determination related to item 1 or 2.

The bill also modifies the definition of “financial institution” so that a financial services provider includes a financial institution chartered under the laws of this state or another state or under federal law.

Who's behind it

28 representatives are its ⁠. 14 are Democrats and 14 are Republicans.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 37 names

Authors (28)

Signed on in support (9)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 11, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 20, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage.

  3. Feb 19, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  4. Feb 18, 2026

    The Assembly passed it.

  5. Feb 18, 2026

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Feb 16, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  7. Feb 11, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Feb 11, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  9. Feb 6, 2026 to Feb 11, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  10. Feb 5, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Feb 2, 2026 to Feb 4, 2026

    3 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.

  12. Jan 30, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.

  13. Jan 30, 2026

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Snyder, Doyle, Novak, Gundrum, McCarville, Taylor, Armstrong, Behnke, Billings, DeSmidt, Dittrich, Fitzgerald, B. Jacobson, Joers, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Mursau, Neubauer, O'Connor, Ortiz-Velez, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Rivera-Wagner, Roe, Sinicki, Snodgrass and Subeck; cosponsored by Senators Quinn and Wall

  2. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Financial Institutions

  3. Feb 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Senator Wirch added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Palmeri added as a coauthor

  5. Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Emerson added as a coauthor

  6. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  7. Feb 5, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Feb 6, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Udell added as a coauthor

  9. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Stubbs added as a coauthor

  11. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  12. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Feb 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from Committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 2-17-2026

  14. Feb 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Representatives Miresse and Anderson added as coauthors

  15. Feb 17, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:38 PM on 2-18-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 13

  16. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Neubauer

  17. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Snyder

  19. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  20. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  23. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 19, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  25. Feb 20, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Sporting Heritage

  26. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote