Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 992

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose costs. (FE)

Administrative rules Administrative rules — Revisions

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, generally, if a proposed administrative rule is reasonably expected to pass along $10,000,000 or more in implementation and compliance costs to businesses, local governmental units, and individuals over any two-year period, the agency proposing the rule must stop working on the proposed rule until 1) the agency modifies the proposed rule to reduce the expected costs or 2) a bill is enacted that allows the agency to promulgate the proposed rule.

This bill lowers the threshold for these provisions from $10,000,000 to $4,000,000. The bill also specifically prohibits an agency from promulgating multiple or separate rules in order to avoid the prohibition described above.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Armstrong (R) , B. Jacobson (R) , Behnke (R) , Brooks (R) , Green (R) , Gundrum (R) , Hurd (R) , Kaufert (R) , Knodl (R) , Kreibich (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , Neylon (R) , O'Connor (R) , Penterman (R) , Sortwell (R) , Spiros (R) , Tucker (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Wichgers (R)

1 cosponsors

Jacque (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 2

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Full history

  1. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hurd, B. Jacobson, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Green, Gundrum, Kaufert, Knodl, Kreibich, Moses, Murphy, Neylon, O'Connor, Penterman, Sortwell, Spiros, Tucker, Tusler, VanderMeer and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senator Jacque

  2. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs

  3. Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 5, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Feb 6, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Feb 9, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Feb 9, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  14. Feb 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Feb 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  17. Feb 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  18. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  19. Apr 6, 2026 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received