Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Joint Resolution 112

The right to keep and bear arms (first consideration)

Topics: Constitutional amendments: First consideration, Firearms and dangerous weapons

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 29, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Adopted, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to adopt pursuant to ⁠”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same proposal was also filed in the Senate as SJR 105. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Currently, the Wisconsin Constitution guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms for security, defense, hunting, recreation, or any other lawful purpose. This constitutional amendment, proposed to the 2025 legislature on first consideration, guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms without qualification. The amendment further provides that the right to keep and bear arms is an inalienable and fundamental individual right that shall never be infringed. Finally, under the amendment, any restriction on the right to keep and bear arms shall be subject to strict scrutiny. Strict scrutiny is a standard of judicial review of government limitations on fundamental rights that generally provides that such a limitation is valid and enforceable only if it is necessary to achieve a compelling state interest, if it is narrowly tailored to its purpose, and if no reasonable less restrictive alternative exists.

A proposed constitutional amendment requires adoption by two successive legislatures, and ratification by the people, before it can become effective.

Who's behind it

13 representatives are its ⁠. All 13 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (7)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this proposal, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this proposal.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Jan 22, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Jan 22, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption as amended of Assembly Joint Resolution 112 recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the proposal died with it.

  2. Jan 22, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Jan 22, 2026

    “Report adoption as amended of Assembly Joint Resolution 112 recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 3” (the official wording)

  4. Jan 21, 2026

    The committee voted on it.

  5. Jan 7, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Nov 4, 2025 to Jan 7, 2026

    3 more representatives signed on in support.

  7. Oct 29, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary.

  8. Oct 29, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 29, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Green, Behnke, Callahan, Goeben, B. Jacobson, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Penterman, Piwowarczyk, Swearingen, Tucker and Pronschinske; cosponsored by Senators Jacque, Nass, Stafsholt and Wimberger

  2. Oct 29, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary

  3. Nov 4, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Armstrong added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 6, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor

  5. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Gustafson added as a coauthor

  6. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  8. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Green

  9. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  11. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Report adoption as amended of Assembly Joint Resolution 112 recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  12. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote