Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 1177

Performing risk-limiting audits and eliminating the process for removing excess ballots from the vote count. (FE)

Topics: County: Officers, Elections, Elections Commission, Elections: Ballots

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 19, 2026

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Fiscal estimate received”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development. The committee's chair at the time was Dan Feyen. Chairs decide which bills get a hearing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 1212. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Risk-limiting audits This bill requires each county clerk to perform risk-limiting audits beginning with elections held in 2027. The bill defines a “risk-limiting audit” as an audit protocol that uses statistical methods to limit to acceptable levels the risk of certifying a preliminary election outcome that is an incorrect outcome.

Under the bill, each county clerk must conduct a risk-limiting audit of selected contests for each election by manual inspection of random samples of paper ballots in randomly selected audit units. An “audit unit” is, generally, a ward, election district, reporting unit, batch, scanner feed, or other unit of vote aggregation used by a county to report electronic voting system or voting machine vote totals. The bill defines a “selected contest” as a contested statewide election for a candidate or referendum that garners the most total votes and, if available at the same election, at least one additional contested statewide election for a candidate or referendum that is randomly selected by the Elections Commission at a public meeting held no later than seven days after the election.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, the county clerk must complete the risk-limiting audit of each election before completing the county canvass and certifying the election results to the Elections Commission. If a risk-limiting audit of a selected contest results in a full manual tally of ballots that were cast using an electronic voting system, the vote counts according to the full manual tally will replace the reported vote counts using an electronic voting system for the purpose of determining the official results.

Finally, under current law, following each general election the Elections Commission must audit the performance of each voting system used in this state to determine the error rate of the system in counting ballots that are validly cast by voters. The risk-limiting audit under the bill does not replace the performance audit under current law. Under the bill, if a general election contest is selected for a risk-limiting audit, the commission conducts a performance audit and the county clerks conducts a risk-limiting audit.

Removing excess ballots from the vote count Under current law, for purposes of reconciling the votes cast after an election, if the number of ballots exceeds the total number of voters recorded on the poll list, the inspectors or board of absentee ballot canvassers, as appropriate, place the ballots in a ballot box and one of the inspectors or a member of the board of absentee ballot canvassers publicly and without examination draws from the ballot box the number of ballots equal to the excess number of ballots. The excess ballots drawn from the box are not counted, but are marked on the original canvass as having been removed due to an excess number of ballots. The removed ballots are set aside and preserved.

Under the bill, beginning with the implementation of risk-limiting audits, if the number of ballots exceeds the total number of voters recorded on the poll list, all of the excess ballots are counted. The inspectors or board of absentee ballot canvassers, as appropriate, document the discrepancy in detail, including the number and type of excess ballots. Any documented discrepancy in the number and type of excess ballots are factored into the risk-limiting audit determinations. If the discrepancy exceeds 0.5 percent of the total ballots cast in the audit unit, the Elections Commission must conduct an investigation into the cause of the discrepancy.

Who's behind it

Eric Wimberger, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  2. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  3. Mar 19, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development.

  4. Mar 19, 2026

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Wimberger; cosponsored by Representative Krug

  2. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development

  3. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  4. May 13, 2026 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate