Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session
Relating to: residency requirements for certain employees of a local governmental unit. (FE)
County — Officers Fire department Firearms and dangerous weapons Municipality — Officers Police Public officers School — Administration Village — Officers
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a local governmental unit (city, village, town, county, or school district) may not, generally, require as a condition of employment that any employee or prospective employee reside within any jurisdictional limit. Current law provides limited exceptions to the prohibition on residency requirements for law enforcement, fire, or emergency personnel.
Under this bill, 1) a city or village that operates under the city manager system of government may impose a residency requirement on a city manager; 2) a school board may impose a residency requirement on a school district administrator; 3) a police, fire, or combined protective services department may impose a residency requirement on its chief; 4) a city or village may impose a residency requirement on a city or village administrator; and 5) a county that does not have an elected county executive may impose a residency requirement on a county administrator.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Mar 19, 2026 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Spreitzer, Carpenter, Larson and Roys; cosponsored by Representatives Anderson, Brown, Clancy, Emerson, Palmeri, Sinicki and Udell
- Mar 19, 2026 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government
- Mar 23, 2026 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Apr 8, 2026 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received