Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 1182

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: testing cosmetics on animals and providing a penalty.

Animal — Treatment Business Trade practice

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill prohibits or restricts “cosmetic animal testing,” defined as the internal or external application of a cosmetic or cosmetic ingredient to the skin, eyes, or other body part of a live, nonhuman vertebrate. A “cosmetic” is defined to include an article applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering its appearance, including personal hygiene products. A “cosmetic ingredient” is a chemical entity or mixture used as a component in the manufacture of a cosmetic. A “cosmetic manufacturer” is a manufacturer, packer, or distributor identified on a cosmetic label as required by federal law.

The bill generally prohibits a cosmetic manufacturer from doing any of the following:

1. Conducting or contracting for cosmetic animal testing that occurs in this state.

2. Manufacturing or importing into this state a cosmetic or cosmetic ingredient if the cosmetic manufacturer knows or reasonably should know that the cosmetic or cosmetic ingredient was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing.

3. Selling or offering for sale in this state a cosmetic if the cosmetic manufacturer knows or reasonably should know that the cosmetic or a cosmetic ingredient in the cosmetic was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing.

The bill provides a phase-in period for these prohibitions. These prohibitions also do not apply in circumstances when 1) cosmetic animal testing is conducted for the purpose of compliance with federal, state, or foreign regulatory requirements if specified conditions are satisfied, or 2) the cosmetic is subject to certain provisions of the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. A person who violates the bill’s provisions is subject to a forfeiture of $5,000 for the violation and an additional $1,000 for each day the violation continues.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Habush Sinykin (D) , Larson (D) , Smith (D) , Spreitzer (D)

14 cosponsors

Anderson (D) , Bare (D) , Brown (D) , Clancy (D) , Keyeski (D) , Miresse (D) , Moore Omokunde (D) , Prado (D) , Roe (D) , Sinicki (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Tenorio (D) , Vining (D)

Full history

  1. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Spreitzer, Habush Sinykin, Larson and Smith; cosponsored by Representatives Vining, Sinicki, Tenorio, Bare, Brown, Clancy, Miresse, Moore Omokunde, Prado, Roe, Stubbs, Anderson and Subeck

  2. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

  3. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  4. Mar 30, 2026 · Senate

    Senator Keyeski added as a coauthor