Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 214

Registration of out-of-state health care providers to provide telehealth services. (FE)

Topics: Interstate relations, Medical malpractice, Medical service, Physician, Safety and Professional Services, Department of, Telecommunications

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 20, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 16, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Oct 14, 2025

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 52 to 44

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 20, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 212. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows an individual who possesses a credential as a health care provider in another state to provide health care services by telehealth in this state within the scope of practice established under the laws and rules of this state by registering with the Department of Safety and Professional Services or an applicable credentialing board. In general, under current law, no person may provide health care services in this state for which a credential is required unless the person possesses a credential issued in this state issued by DSPS or a credentialing board. This bill requires DSPS and any applicable credentialing board to register an out-of-state health care provider who does not possess a credential in this state as a telehealth provider who may provide health care services in this state by telehealth if the health care provider meets certain criteria, including 1) that the health care provider possesses a credential issued by a governmental authority in another state, the District of Columbia, or a possession or territory of the United States that is active and unencumbered and that entitles the health care provider to perform health care services that are substantially similar to health care services that may be performed by a health care provider who possesses a credential issued in this state; 2) that the health care provider has not been subject to any disciplinary action relating to his or her credential during the five-year period immediately preceding submission of the health care provider’s application for registration in this state that has resulted in his or her credential being limited, suspended, or revoked; and 3) that the health care provider designates an agent upon whom service of process may be made in this state. A health care provider registered to provide telehealth services under the bill may not open an office in this state and may not provide in-person health care services to patients located in this state unless the health care provider obtains a credential in this state. The bill requires individuals registered to provide telehealth services in this state to maintain and have in effect malpractice liability insurance coverage that covers services provided to patients in this state if the health care services that the individual may provide are substantially similar to services provided by a health care provider in this state who is required under law to maintain and have in effect malpractice liability insurance.

The bill requires individuals registered under the bill to provide telehealth services in this state to notify DSPS or the applicable credentialing board of any restrictions placed on his or her credential in any state or jurisdiction and of any disciplinary action taken or pending against him or her in any state or jurisdiction within five business days after the restriction is placed or disciplinary action is initiated or taken. The bill allows DSPS and applicable credentialing boards to take disciplinary action against a health care provider registered to provide telehealth services under the bill if the registrant fails to notify DSPS or the applicable credentialing board of any adverse actions taken against his or her credential, if the registrant has restrictions placed on his or her credential, if disciplinary action has been commenced against the registrant in any state or jurisdiction, if the registrant violates any provision under the bill, or if the registrant commits any act that constitutes grounds for disciplinary action applicable to the registrant’s health care practice in this state.

Read the full summary

Finally, the bill requires DSPS to publish on its website a list of all health care providers registered to provide telehealth services under the bill and include, to the extent applicable, certain information including the registrant’s name, the registrant’s health care occupation, a brief explanation of the registrant’s training and education, including completion dates and any certificates or degrees obtained, the registrant’s out-of-state health care license, permit, certificate, or other approval, including any identification number associated with the registrant’s license, permit, certificate, or other approval, the registrant’s specialty, a five-year disciplinary history of the registrant, the registrant’s medical malpractice insurance provider and any policy limits under the registrant’s medical malpractice insurance coverage, and the name and address of the registrant’s agent designated for service of process in this state.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 13 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jun 12, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 15 · Oct 14, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 52 to 44 · Jan 15, 2026 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (52)

No (44)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “SHALL THE DECISION OF THE CHAIR STAND”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 52 to 44 · Jan 15, 2026 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (52)

No (44)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 20, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Mar 18, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 15, 2026

    The Assembly passed it too, 52 to 44.

  5. Jan 15, 2026

    “Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken” (the official wording)

  6. Jan 12, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Oct 14, 2025

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Oct 14, 2025

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Oct 14, 2025

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Jun 18, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  11. Jun 17, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Jun 16, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Jun 12, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  14. Jun 4, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Apr 30, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  16. Apr 16, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health.

  17. Apr 16, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 16, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Stafsholt and Quinn; cosponsored by Representatives Gustafson, Franklin, Green, Gundrum, Knodl, Melotik, Murphy, Mursau, Piwowarczyk and Wichgers

  2. Apr 16, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Apr 30, 2025 · Senate

    Representative O'Connor added as a cosponsor

  4. Jun 4, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Jun 12, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Jun 12, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Jun 12, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Jun 16, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Jun 17, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Jun 17, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 6-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Smith, Ratcliff, Habush Sinykin, Pfaff and Carpenter

  12. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Referred to committee on Senate Organization

  14. Oct 13, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-14-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  15. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Stafsholt

  16. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  17. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  18. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  20. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  21. Oct 14, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Oct 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  23. Jan 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  24. Jan 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Wichgers

  25. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-15-2026 by Committee on Rules

  26. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  27. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  28. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative McGuire

  29. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  30. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  31. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 52, Noes 44

  32. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  33. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  34. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  35. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 52, Noes 44, Paired 2

  36. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  37. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  38. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 2)

  39. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  40. Mar 18, 2026 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2026

  41. Mar 20, 2026 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-20-2026

  42. May 12, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  43. May 13, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote