Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 276

Challenges to the validity of administrative rules and making an appropriation. (FE)

Topics: Administrative rules, Attorney: Fee, Court

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 20, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 21, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 11, 2026

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 53 to 45

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 20, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 275. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the validity of an administrative rule may be challenged in an action for declaratory judgment or in certain other judicial proceedings when material therein. This bill requires a court, if the court declares a rule invalid, to award the party asserting the invalidity of the rule reasonable attorney fees and costs.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. All 8 are Republicans.

25 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 33 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (25)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Licensing vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Nov 7, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it

Passed, 11 to 4 · Feb 3, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 15 · Feb 11, 2026

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 53 to 45 · Feb 12, 2026 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (53)

No (45)

Didn't vote (1)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 20, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Mar 18, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 12, 2026

    The Assembly passed it too, 53 to 45.

  5. Feb 12, 2026

    “Read” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 12, 2026

    The Assembly received it.

  7. Feb 11, 2026

    The Senate passed it, 18 to 15.

  8. Feb 11, 2026

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Feb 3, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 4.

  10. Jan 30, 2026

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  11. Jan 14, 2026

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Dec 4, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Nov 7, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  14. Oct 9, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Aug 4, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Jun 30, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Jun 13, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Jun 5, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Jun 4, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Jun 2, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  21. May 28, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  22. May 21, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs.

  23. May 21, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 21, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wimberger, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Feyen, Hutton, Nass, Stafsholt and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Tusler, Armstrong, Behnke, Brooks, Callahan, Dittrich, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, B. Jacobson, Knodl, Maxey, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Neylon, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk, Rodriguez, Steffen, Tittl, Tranel, Wichgers and Wittke

  2. May 21, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

  3. May 28, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 2, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jun 4, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jun 4, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jun 5, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jun 13, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Jun 13, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Jun 13, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Jun 30, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  12. Aug 4, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Oct 9, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  14. Nov 7, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  15. Nov 7, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  16. Nov 7, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Dec 4, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  18. Jan 14, 2026 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  19. Jan 30, 2026 · Senate

    Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)

  20. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  21. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  22. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  23. Feb 6, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wimberger

  24. Feb 9, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  27. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  29. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  30. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  32. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Read

  33. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from Senate message and take up

  34. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  35. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  36. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  37. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 53, Noes 45

  38. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  39. Feb 13, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  40. Feb 20, 2026 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  41. Mar 18, 2026 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2026

  42. Mar 20, 2026 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-20-2026

  43. May 12, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  44. May 13, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote