Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 375

The use of speed safety camera systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty. (FE)

Topics: Milwaukee: Police, Motor vehicle: Regulation, Motor vehicle: Regulation: Speed

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jul 16, 2025

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 371. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows law enforcement agencies in a first class city (presently only Milwaukee) to use a speed safety camera system (SSCS) to identify speed limit violations and a traffic control photographic system (TCPS) to identify certain traffic signal violations.

Under current law, law enforcement officers may not use any radar device combined with photographic identification of a vehicle to determine compliance with motor vehicle speed limits. Under this bill, a first class city may use an SSCS to determine compliance with speed limits. With exceptions, the vehicle owner is subject to a forfeiture for a speed limit violation detected by an SSCS. However, no traffic citation may be issued for a speed limit violation for which the SSCS indicated a speed of less than 15 miles per hour above the speed limit alleged to be violated. The owner is subject to the same forfeiture that would be applicable to the vehicle operator for the violation. The bill also imposes a number of administrative requirements on a municipality that uses an SSCS to determine compliance with speed limits. The authorization of the use of an SSCS to determine compliance with speed limits expires five years after an SSCS is implemented.

Read the full summary

This bill also authorizes a first class city to use a TCPS to detect motor vehicles that fail to properly stop at red traffic signals at intersections. A TCPS is an electronic system that automatically produces photographs of motor vehicles traveling through an intersection. With exceptions, the vehicle owner is subject to a forfeiture for a traffic signal violation detected by a TCPS of not more than the amount provided for a traffic signal violation under current law, currently between $20 and $100. The authorization of the use of a TCPS to detect traffic signal violations expires five years after a TCPS is implemented.

Forfeitures collected under either of these authorizations must be appropriated for the costs of implementing and operating the system and after those costs have been paid may be used only for traffic enforcement, traffic safety programs, and traffic safety infrastructure.

Who's behind it

9 senators are its ⁠. 7 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

19 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 28 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (19)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 9, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  3. Nov 3, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Oct 7, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Oct 7, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Jul 21, 2025

    “Representatives Phelps and Sinicki withdrawn as cosponsors” (the official wording)

  7. Jul 16, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government.

  8. Jul 16, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jul 16, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Tomczyk, Drake, L. Johnson, Carpenter, Habush Sinykin, Keyeski, Pfaff, Spreitzer and James; cosponsored by Representatives Novak, Haywood, Goodwin, Kirsch, Brooks, Duchow, Knodl, Miresse, Melotik, Tusler, Arney, Palmeri, Prado, Neylon, Udell, Sinicki and Phelps

  2. Jul 16, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  3. Jul 21, 2025 · Senate

    Representatives Phelps and Sinicki withdrawn as cosponsors

  4. Oct 7, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Andraca added as a cosponsor

  5. Oct 7, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Nov 3, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 9, 2026 · Senate

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  8. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate