Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 382

Modifications to the historic rehabilitation tax credit. (FE)

Topics: Building, Corporation: Taxation, Economic Development Corporation, Wisconsin, Income tax: Credit

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jul 28, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 375. That version became law.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill modifies the historic rehabilitation tax credit, which allows taxpayers to claim a credit for the amounts spent to rehabilitate certified historic structures located in Wisconsin. The credit is based on the federal rehabilitation tax credit. In general, a taxpayer may claim both credits for the same rehabilitation project; however, in some cases, a taxpayer may not be able to claim both due to differences in state and federal law.

Under current law, taxpayers may claim a credit equal to 20 percent of their qualified rehabilitation expenditures so long as the expenditures are at least $50,000. Federal law further requires the expenditures exceed the greater of the taxpayer’s adjusted basis in the property (initial cost with certain adjustments) or $5,000. The bill provides that the federal requirement does not apply, while maintaining the $50,000 threshold.

Read the full summary

Also under current law, a taxpayer must be certified by the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation to claim the credit. As part of this requirement, the taxpayer must provide to WEDC evidence that the State Historic Preservation Officer approved the rehabilitation before the work began and that the SHPO recommended the rehabilitation for approval to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior. The bill removes the requirement regarding SHPO recommendation for federal approval if the taxpayer claims only the state credit.

The bill modifies the timing for claiming the credit, which is currently based on when the taxpayer claims the federal credit. Federal law, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, generally requires taxpayers claim the credit in equal amounts over five years. Under the bill, the full credit is generally claimed in one year.

The bill sunsets the credit for the rehabilitation of qualifying buildings that are not certified historic structures and the corresponding requirement that WEDC certify taxpayers to claim that credit. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act had sunsetted a similar federal credit.

Finally, current law prohibits WEDC from certifying persons to claim more than a total of $3,500,000 in tax credits for all projects undertaken on the same parcel. Under the bill, this restriction only applies to certifying persons to claim tax credits for all projects undertaken on the same parcel within a single 10-year period.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

17 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (17)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Sep 19, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 0 · Sep 19, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Sep 25, 2025 to Jan 9, 2026

    5 more representatives and 2 senators signed on in support.

  3. Sep 19, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.

  4. Sep 19, 2025

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  5. Sep 3, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. Aug 28, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Aug 11, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Aug 4, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Jul 28, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue.

  10. Jul 28, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jul 28, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Feyen, Dassler-Alfheim, Habush Sinykin, L. Johnson and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Armstrong, Kreibich, Joers, Moses, Mursau, Ortiz-Velez, Tittl, Tranel and Udell

  2. Jul 28, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture and Revenue

  3. Aug 4, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Aug 11, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Aug 28, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Sep 3, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen

  7. Sep 3, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Snodgrass added as a cosponsor

  8. Sep 18, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Sep 19, 2025 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  10. Sep 19, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  11. Sep 19, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. Sep 25, 2025 · Senate

    Representative McCarville added as a cosponsor

  13. Oct 2, 2025 · Senate

    Senator Larson added as a coauthor

  14. Oct 7, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Palmeri added as a cosponsor

  15. Oct 7, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Miresse added as a cosponsor

  16. Oct 20, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Anderson added as a cosponsor

  17. Oct 27, 2025 · Senate

    Senator Ratcliff added as a coauthor

  18. Jan 9, 2026 · Senate

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  19. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote