Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 430

Special motions to strike strategic lawsuits against public participation. (FE)

Topics: Court: Procedure, Freedom of speech and press

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 29, 2025

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs. The committee's chair at the time was Chris Kapenga. Chairs decide which bills get a hearing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 431. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows a person to file a special motion to strike in a strategic lawsuit against public participation which, if successful, results in dismissal of the claim subject to the motion. Under the bill, a cause of action brought against a person arising from that person’s acts in furtherance of his or her right of petition or free speech under the U.S. or Wisconsin Constitution in connection with a public issue is subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability of prevailing on the claim.

The bill provides that an act in furtherance of a person’s constitutional right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue includes any written or oral statement or writing made 1) before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; 2) in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official proceeding authorized by law; or 3) in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest. The bill also provides that any other conduct might also be considered to be an act in furtherance of a person’s constitutional right of petition or free speech in connection with a public issue. No special motion to strike may be brought in any enforcement action brought in the name of the people of Wisconsin by the attorney general, a district attorney, or a city attorney, acting as a public prosecutor.

Read the full summary

In making a determination on a special motion to strike, the court must consider the pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based. If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim, neither that determination nor the fact of that determination are admissible in evidence at any later stage of the case, or in any subsequent action, and no burden of proof or degree of proof otherwise applicable is affected by that determination in that case or any subsequent proceeding. Under the bill, except in certain circumstances, a defendant who prevails on a special motion to strike is entitled to recover attorney fees and costs. If, however, the court finds that a special motion to strike is frivolous or is solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court must award costs and reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing plaintiff. The bill allows a person to appeal as a matter or right an order granting or denying a special motion to strike.

The bill requires that a special motion be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or later if the court permits. The motion must be scheduled for a hearing not more than 30 days after the service of the motion unless the court’s schedule does not allow for a hearing in that timeframe. Unless the court determines otherwise, when a notice of a special motion is filed, all discovery proceedings in the action are stayed until a ruling is made on the motion.

Any party who files a special motion to strike, and any party who files an opposition to a special motion to strike, must provide the director of state courts with a copy of the endorsed, filed caption page of the motion or opposition, a copy of any related notice or appeal or petition for a writ, and a conformed copy of any order issued, including any order granting or denying a special motion to strike, discovery, or fees. Under the bill, the director of state courts must keep a public record of the information for at least three years.

Who's behind it

7 senators are its ⁠. All 7 are Democrats.

16 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (16)

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 14, 2025 to Jan 9, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Sep 29, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs.

  4. Sep 29, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 29, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Roys, Larson, Dassler-Alfheim, Hesselbein, Keyeski, Ratcliff and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Phelps, Joers, Andraca, Anderson, Arney, Bare, Clancy, Madison, Palmeri, Rivera-Wagner, Snodgrass, Stubbs, Tenorio and Udell

  2. Sep 29, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

  3. Nov 14, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Vining added as a cosponsor

  4. Jan 9, 2026 · Senate

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  5. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor