Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 461

Alternative delivery of projects contracted by the Department of Transportation. (FE)

Topics: Road: Construction and repair, Transportation, Department of: Roads

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 20, 2026. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 2, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 18, 2025

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 13, 2026

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2025 Wisconsin Act 104

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 20, 2026: “Published 3-21-2026”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 509. That version died when the session ended.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes numerous changes to alternative delivery of highway projects contracted by the Department of Transportation.

Under current law, the design and construction of highway projects are generally two distinct phases. Under this method, commonly known as “design-bid-build,” DOT has broad authority to accomplish the design of a project. The construction of a project must be executed by contract based on bids, with DOT awarding the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.

Read the full summary

Under a current pilot program, DOT is authorized to award not more than six contracts for design-build projects, which are projects under which the design, engineering, construction, and related services are provided by a single entity. Under the program, DOT may not expend more than $250,000,000 for the six contracts. DOT is also required to maintain an inventory of at least five projects suitable for selection as design-build projects.

The bill eliminates the pilot program and the requirement that DOT maintain an inventory of design-build suitable projects. The bill provides that DOT may encumber not more than $300,000,000 in each fiscal biennium for state trunk highway improvement projects using alternative project delivery, which is defined as any construction project delivery method, other than design-bid-build, that is eligible for federal funding.

Current law details how, under the pilot program, DOT must solicit requests for qualifications, requests for proposals, and cost proposals and how DOT must award contracts. The bill eliminates these requirements and provides that DOT must use a procedure that conforms to federal regulations for evaluating and selecting contracts under which the design and construction are provided by a single entity.

The bill provides that, for alternative project delivery, a technical review committee must review all responses to a request for qualifications and determine which respondents are qualified responsible bidders. The technical review committee must also review and evaluate each proposal provided in response to a request for proposals. Finally, the technical review committee must make a recommendation for awarding a contract, but only if DOT received two or more proposals.

Under the pilot program that the bill eliminates, DOT must award a stipulated fee of not less than three-tenths of 1 percent of DOT’s estimated cost of design and construction to 1) each qualified responsible bidder that provides a responsive but unsuccessful proposal, 2) each qualified responsible bidder that provides a responsive proposal if DOT does not award a contract, and 3) each qualified responsible bidder if DOT cancels the the solicitation before the technical review committee reviews technical proposals.

Under the bill, DOT must award the stipulated fee for design-build projects and may award the stipulated fee for other alternative delivery projects, if the fee is included in the notice of solicitation for the project.

Under the pilot program that the bill eliminates, any person aggrieved and directly affected by a DOT decision to issue a request for qualifications or a request for proposals is entitled to judicial review of the decision. The bill does not include a similar provision for alternative project delivery.

Who's behind it

6 senators are its ⁠. 3 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 10, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 10, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 20, 2026

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 20, 2026

    The governor signed it. It became 2025 Wisconsin Act 104.

  3. Mar 18, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 9, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Jan 13, 2026

    The Assembly passed it too.

  6. Jan 7, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Nov 19, 2025

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Nov 18, 2025

    The Senate passed it.

  9. Nov 18, 2025

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Nov 10, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Nov 10, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  12. Nov 10, 2025

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  13. Oct 28, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Oct 17, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Oct 2, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government.

  16. Oct 2, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 2, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Marklein, Feyen, Keyeski, Spreitzer, Testin and Ratcliff; cosponsored by Representatives Dallman, Dittrich, Goodwin, Kaufert, Knodl, Maxey, Moses, Murphy and O'Connor

  2. Oct 2, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  3. Oct 17, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a cosponsor

  4. Oct 22, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein

  5. Oct 28, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Nov 14, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  16. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-13-2026 by Committee on Rules

  21. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  22. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Jan 14, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction

  29. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Feb 9, 2026 · Senate

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  31. Mar 18, 2026 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2026

  32. Mar 20, 2026 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-20-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 104

  33. Mar 20, 2026 · Senate

    Published 3-21-2026

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote