Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 461

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: alternative delivery of projects contracted by the Department of Transportation. (FE)

Road — Construction and repair Transportation department of — Roads

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes numerous changes to alternative delivery of highway projects contracted by the Department of Transportation.

Under current law, the design and construction of highway projects are generally two distinct phases. Under this method, commonly known as “design-bid-build,” DOT has broad authority to accomplish the design of a project. The construction of a project must be executed by contract based on bids, with DOT awarding the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.

Under a current pilot program, DOT is authorized to award not more than six contracts for design-build projects, which are projects under which the design, engineering, construction, and related services are provided by a single entity. Under the program, DOT may not expend more than $250,000,000 for the six contracts. DOT is also required to maintain an inventory of at least five projects suitable for selection as design-build projects.

The bill eliminates the pilot program and the requirement that DOT maintain an inventory of design-build suitable projects. The bill provides that DOT may encumber not more than $300,000,000 in each fiscal biennium for state trunk highway improvement projects using alternative project delivery, which is defined as any construction project delivery method, other than design-bid-build, that is eligible for federal funding.

Current law details how, under the pilot program, DOT must solicit requests for qualifications, requests for proposals, and cost proposals and how DOT must award contracts. The bill eliminates these requirements and provides that DOT must use a procedure that conforms to federal regulations for evaluating and selecting contracts under which the design and construction are provided by a single entity.

The bill provides that, for alternative project delivery, a technical review committee must review all responses to a request for qualifications and determine which respondents are qualified responsible bidders. The technical review committee must also review and evaluate each proposal provided in response to a request for proposals. Finally, the technical review committee must make a recommendation for awarding a contract, but only if DOT received two or more proposals.

Under the pilot program that the bill eliminates, DOT must award a stipulated fee of not less than three-tenths of 1 percent of DOT’s estimated cost of design and construction to 1) each qualified responsible bidder that provides a responsive but unsuccessful proposal, 2) each qualified responsible bidder that provides a responsive proposal if DOT does not award a contract, and 3) each qualified responsible bidder if DOT cancels the the solicitation before the technical review committee reviews technical proposals.

Under the bill, DOT must award the stipulated fee for design-build projects and may award the stipulated fee for other alternative delivery projects, if the fee is included in the notice of solicitation for the project.

Under the pilot program that the bill eliminates, any person aggrieved and directly affected by a DOT decision to issue a request for qualifications or a request for proposals is entitled to judicial review of the decision. The bill does not include a similar provision for alternative project delivery.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Feyen (R) , Keyeski (D) , Marklein (R) , Ratcliff (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Testin (R)

11 cosponsors

Dallman (R) , Dittrich (R) , Goodwin (D) , J. Jacobson (D) , Kaufert (R) , Knodl (R) , Maxey (R) , Moses (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Ortiz-Velez (D)

Registered lobbying interests · 4

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Nov 10, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Nov 10, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 2, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Marklein, Feyen, Keyeski, Spreitzer, Testin and Ratcliff; cosponsored by Representatives Dallman, Dittrich, Goodwin, Kaufert, Knodl, Maxey, Moses, Murphy and O'Connor

  2. Oct 2, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  3. Oct 17, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a cosponsor

  4. Oct 22, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein

  5. Oct 28, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  8. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Nov 14, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  12. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  16. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  19. Jan 7, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  20. Jan 8, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-13-2026 by Committee on Rules

  21. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  22. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  24. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  25. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  26. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  27. Jan 14, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  28. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction

  29. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Feb 9, 2026 · Senate

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  31. Mar 18, 2026 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-18-2026

  32. Mar 20, 2026 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-20-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 104

  33. Mar 20, 2026 · Senate

    Published 3-21-2026