Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session
Relating to: removal of vegetation obstructing outdoor advertising signs.
Billboard Forestry Plants Transportation department of — Roads
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, stopped here
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Transportation is responsible for maintenance of the highway right-of-way on highways under its jurisdiction. DOT must provide for the care, protection, and maintenance of trees and other roadside vegetation, including cutting, trimming, or removing trees and other vegetation as needed to provide safety to highway users. Current law generally prohibits a person from cutting, trimming, removing, or planting a tree or other vegetation within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway, including interstate highways, without DOT’s consent.
Under current law, outdoor advertising signs (signs) viewable from a highway are regulated and subject to an annual permit fee payable to DOT (sign permit). A sign owner may also apply for a permit from DOT that authorizes the owner to maintain and remove vegetation obstructing the view of the owner’s sign along a state trunk highway, including an interstate highway (vegetation removal permit).
Under current law, a vegetation removal permit authorizes sign owners to trim or remove vegetation approved by DOT for removal within a sign’s “viewing zone,” which is the final 1,000 feet along the highway when approaching a sign. The bill defines a “viewing window,” which is the final 500 feet of the viewing zone. Under the bill, a sign owner with a vegetation removal permit may clear cut all vegetation within a sign’s viewing window, including vegetation located in the median of a divided highway.
Under current law, a vegetation removal permit holder that removes trees with a diameter of two inches or more must compensate DOT for the removed trees. The bill eliminates the requirement that an arborist be employed and provides that compensation is due only if the trees were removed from a living snow fence. The bill defines “living snow fence” to mean vegetation that functions as a berm or barrier to inhibit the accumulation of snow on the highway during the winter season that is planted by the department in a highway right-of-way and the location of which is documented by the department. The bill increases the amount of compensation from $200 to $300 per tree and requires DOT to use the amounts collected to plant living snow fences.
Finally, the bill provides that a sign owner who was issued a vegetation removal permit on or after May 19, 2012, is not required to apply for subsequent permits for the same sign and may remove vegetation in the sign’s viewing window without additional approval or supervision by DOT. The sign owner must notify DOT prior to removal of any vegetation and must provide DOT with photographs of the sign site before and after the vegetation removal is completed.
Sponsors
Registered lobbying interests · 10
Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record
- Association of Wisconsin Tourism Attractions
- Destinations Wisconsin
- National Federation of Independent Business
- Outdoor Advertising Association of Wisconsin
- Scenic Wisconsin (formerly Citizens for a Scenic Wisconsin)
- Wisconsin Dells Visitors and Convention Bureau
- Wisconsin Fuel & Retail Association (WFRA)
- Wisconsin Grocers Association
- Wisconsin Hotel and Lodging Association
- Wisconsin Restaurant Association
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Nov 10, 2025 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 9, 2025 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Tomczyk, Jacque, Nass and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Maxey, O'Connor, Armstrong, Behnke, Goeben, Gundrum, Gustafson, B. Jacobson, Knodl, Melotik, Mursau, Penterman, Spiros, Steffen, Tucker, Wichgers and Doyle
- Oct 9, 2025 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government
- Nov 5, 2025 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Nov 10, 2025 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Nov 10, 2025 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Nov 10, 2025 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 14, 2025 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 18, 2025 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 18, 2025 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 18, 2025 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 18, 2025 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 18, 2025 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Jan 12, 2026 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-15-2026 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 16, 2026 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Jan 16, 2026 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Mar 26, 2026 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2026
- Mar 27, 2026 · Senate
Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-27-2026
- May 12, 2026 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 13, 2026 · Senate
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82