Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 525

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: removal of vegetation obstructing outdoor advertising signs.

Billboard Forestry Plants Transportation department of — Roads

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Department of Transportation is responsible for maintenance of the highway right-of-way on highways under its jurisdiction. DOT must provide for the care, protection, and maintenance of trees and other roadside vegetation, including cutting, trimming, or removing trees and other vegetation as needed to provide safety to highway users. Current law generally prohibits a person from cutting, trimming, removing, or planting a tree or other vegetation within the right-of-way of a state trunk highway, including interstate highways, without DOT’s consent.

Under current law, outdoor advertising signs (signs) viewable from a highway are regulated and subject to an annual permit fee payable to DOT (sign permit). A sign owner may also apply for a permit from DOT that authorizes the owner to maintain and remove vegetation obstructing the view of the owner’s sign along a state trunk highway, including an interstate highway (vegetation removal permit).

Under current law, a vegetation removal permit authorizes sign owners to trim or remove vegetation approved by DOT for removal within a sign’s “viewing zone,” which is the final 1,000 feet along the highway when approaching a sign. The bill defines a “viewing window,” which is the final 500 feet of the viewing zone. Under the bill, a sign owner with a vegetation removal permit may clear cut all vegetation within a sign’s viewing window, including vegetation located in the median of a divided highway.

Under current law, a vegetation removal permit holder that removes trees with a diameter of two inches or more must compensate DOT for the removed trees. The bill eliminates the requirement that an arborist be employed and provides that compensation is due only if the trees were removed from a living snow fence. The bill defines “living snow fence” to mean vegetation that functions as a berm or barrier to inhibit the accumulation of snow on the highway during the winter season that is planted by the department in a highway right-of-way and the location of which is documented by the department. The bill increases the amount of compensation from $200 to $300 per tree and requires DOT to use the amounts collected to plant living snow fences.

Finally, the bill provides that a sign owner who was issued a vegetation removal permit on or after May 19, 2012, is not required to apply for subsequent permits for the same sign and may remove vegetation in the sign’s viewing window without additional approval or supervision by DOT. The sign owner must notify DOT prior to removal of any vegetation and must provide DOT with photographs of the sign site before and after the vegetation removal is completed.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Jacque (R) , Nass (R) , Tomczyk (R) , Wanggaard (R)

17 cosponsors

Armstrong (R) , B. Jacobson (R) , Behnke (R) , Doyle (D) , Goeben (R) , Gundrum (R) , Gustafson (R) , Knodl (R) , Maxey (R) , Melotik (R) , Mursau (R) , O'Connor (R) , Penterman (R) , Spiros (R) , Steffen (R) , Tucker (R) , Wichgers (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 10

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Nov 10, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 9, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Tomczyk, Jacque, Nass and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Maxey, O'Connor, Armstrong, Behnke, Goeben, Gundrum, Gustafson, B. Jacobson, Knodl, Melotik, Mursau, Penterman, Spiros, Steffen, Tucker, Wichgers and Doyle

  2. Oct 9, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  3. Nov 5, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  6. Nov 10, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Nov 14, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-18-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  9. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  10. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  11. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Nov 18, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  13. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  14. Jan 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  15. Jan 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-15-2026 by Committee on Rules

  16. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  17. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  21. Jan 15, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  23. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  24. Mar 26, 2026 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2026

  25. Mar 27, 2026 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-27-2026

  26. May 12, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  27. May 13, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82