Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 58

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: referendum questions for certain referenda that affect property taxes. (FE)

Bonds — Municipal Property tax Referendum

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a county, city, village, town, school district, or technical college district may exceed its property tax levy limit if the electors of that political subdivision or district approve the increase at a referendum. The ballot question must indicate the dollar amount of the increase in the levy limit. Under this bill, the ballot question must also provide a good faith estimate of the annual dollar amount difference in property taxes on a median-valued, single-family residence located in the political subdivision or district that would result from passage of the referendum.

Also under current law, in certain cases when local governmental units authorize the issuance of bonds, the local governmental unit must adopt a resolution stating the purpose of the bonding and the maximum amounts of borrowing. The local governmental unit, in certain cases, is required or authorized to seek approval of the bonding authorization at a referendum. Among other things, the referendum question must contain a statement of the purpose for which bonds are to be issued and the maximum amount of the bonds to be issued. Under the bill, the question must also provide all of the following:

1. The estimated interest rate and amount of the interest accruing on the bonds.

2. Any fees that will be incurred if the bonds are defeased.

3. A good faith estimate of the dollar amount difference in property taxes on a median-valued, single-family residence located in the local governmental unit that would result from passage of the referendum.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cabral-Guevara (R) , Jacque (R) , Kapenga (R) , Nass (R)

14 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Behnke (R) , Brill (R) , Dittrich (R) , Goeben (R) , Green (R) , Gundrum (R) , Knodl (R) , Kreibich (R) , Maxey (R) , Murphy (R) , O'Connor (R) , Piwowarczyk (R) , Wichgers (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 19

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Full history

  1. Feb 21, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Cabral-Guevara, Jacque, Kapenga and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Allen, Piwowarczyk, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Murphy, O'Connor and Wichgers

  2. Feb 21, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Mar 6, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 11, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 17, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 6, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1