Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 638

The maximum compensation for compatibility with elective offices in cities, villages, and towns. (FE)

Topics: Municipality: Officers, Town: Officers, Village: Officers

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 14, 2025

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government. The committee's chair at the time was Cory Tomczyk. Chairs decide which bills get a hearing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 658. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Generally under current law, the doctrine of compatibility holds that one person cannot hold two offices if one office is superior to another in some respect and the superior office makes decisions about the other office such that the duties exercised under each might conflict to the public detriment. An exception to this doctrine under current law provides that a volunteer fire fighter, emergency medical services practitioner, or emergency medical responder in a city, village, or town whose annual compensation from one or more of those positions, including fringe benefits, does not exceed $25,000 if the city, village, or town has a population of 5,000 or less, or $15,000 if the city, village, or town has a population of has a population of more than 5,000, may also hold an elective office in that city, village, or town.

This bill increases those maximum annual compensation amounts to $35,000 in a city, village, or town with a population of 5,000 or less and $25,000 in a city, village, or town with a population of more than 5,000.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Republican.

15 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (15)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Dec 3, 2025 to Mar 19, 2026

    3 more representatives and 2 senators signed on in support.

  3. Dec 1, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Nov 24, 2025

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  5. Nov 14, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government.

  6. Nov 14, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 14, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Jagler and Dassler-Alfheim; cosponsored by Representatives Kitchens, Dittrich, Goeben, Kaufert, Knodl, Mursau, O'Connor, Sheehan and Wichgers

  2. Nov 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  3. Nov 24, 2025 · Senate

    Representatives Subeck and Ortiz-Velez added as cosponsors

  4. Dec 1, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 3, 2025 · Senate

    Senator Wirch added as a coauthor

  6. Dec 9, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Palmeri added as a cosponsor

  7. Jan 26, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Anderson added as a cosponsor

  8. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Senator Spreitzer added as a coauthor

  9. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  10. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate