Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 682

Regulating hemp-derived cannabinoid products

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Plants, Sales, Youth

Stopped in committee

The voted on it but didn't recommend it, so the full Senate never voted. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 1, 2025

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. The committee didn't recommend it.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 747. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates certain requirements and restrictions related to the sale of hemp-derived cannabinoid products and modifies the definition of hemp.

Current law defines “hemp” as “the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis or the maximum concentration allowed under federal law up to 1 percent, whichever is greater, as tested using post-decarboxylation or other similarly reliable methods.” Current law exempts hemp from the definitions of marijuana and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which are controlled substances and the possession, manufacture, or distribution of which is a criminal offense.

Read the full summary

The bill defines “hemp-derived cannabinoid” as any cannabinoid that is extracted from hemp, including delta-6-THC, delta-8-THC, delta-9-THC, and delta-10-THC, subject to certain exclusions. A “hemp-derived cannabinoid product” is defined, subject to limited exceptions, as a product that contains or is labeled to contain a hemp-derived cannabinoid (HDC) and that is produced, marketed, or otherwise intended to be ingested orally, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin. The bill specifies that the definition of hemp includes an HDC product. The bill also modifies the definition of hemp to specify that the qualifying criteria for hemp is tested using high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, or other similarly reliable methods.

The bill prohibits a person from selling, offering to sell, or otherwise providing an HDC product to a person who has not attained 21 years of age (underage person). The bill also prohibits an underage person from purchasing, attempting to purchase, or possessing an HDC product and from falsely representing his or her age for the purpose of obtaining an HDC product. The bill includes a defense for an HDC product seller if the purchaser appears to be of age and provides documentation supporting his or her false representation that he or she is of age.

Under the bill, before an HDC product may be sold or offered for sale to a consumer, the product manufacturer must submit a sample of each batch of the product to an independent, accredited laboratory for testing in accordance with generally accepted industry standards, and the laboratory must certify all of the following: 1) the product contains the amount of cannabinoids stated on the label, disclosed as a percentage and as milligrams per serving and, if applicable, per container; 2) the product does not contain more than trace amounts of mold, solvents, or certain other materials; and 3) the product is within the allowable delta-9-THC concentration for hemp. The certifying laboratory must provide the manufacturer with a certificate of analysis of testing results (COA) for the product. No person may sell, or offer to sell, to a consumer an HDC product unless the product is accompanied by the COA, which may be provided by means of a quick response (QR) code on the product’s label.

Under the bill, an HDC product may not be sold or offered for sale to a consumer unless the product is labeled with specified information, including 1) the name and contact information for the product’s manufacturer or brand owner; 2) the product’s serving size, servings per container, and cannabinoid profile per serving and in total for the container; 3) the product’s ingredients, including major food allergens; 4) the product’s potency, labeled as milligrams per serving, for total THC and for each HDC and the total amounts of THC and of each HDC in the product’s container; and 5) a warning statement containing specified information. An HDC product may not be sold or offered for sale to a consumer unless the product packaging is child-resistant and does not contain any feature likely to be appealing to children. An HDC product must be in a tamper-evident container or packaging or have a tamper-evident seal.

Under the bill, an HDC product that is produced or marketed as a beverage 1) may not contain more than 10 milligrams of THC in a single serving, and 2) if packaged in a nonresealable container, may not be sold in a container having more than two servings.

The bill specifies that a person may manufacture and sell for export from this state a hemp-extract product that is permitted to be manufactured, packaged, prepared, transported, or held for distribution in this state even if the hemp-extract product is not permitted to be sold to a consumer in this state.

The bill also specifies that a provision of current law, which requires a referral from the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection before a district attorney or the Department of Justice may prosecute a hemp-related violation, does not apply to enforcement of a violation of the bill’s provisions relating to HDC products.

Who's behind it

Patrick Testin, a Republican, is its ⁠.

15 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (15)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue vote on an amendment

Passed, 8 to 0 · Feb 3, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Failed, 4 to 4 · Feb 3, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended without recommendation, pursuant to Senate Rule 27 (4)(a), by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 4, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 3, 2026

    “Report passage as amended without recommendation, pursuant to Senate Rule 27 (4)(a), by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 4, Noes 4” (the official wording)

  3. Feb 3, 2026

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  4. Feb 3, 2026

    The committee voted on it.

  5. Jan 13, 2026 to Jan 20, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  6. Jan 8, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Dec 4, 2025 to Dec 15, 2025

    3 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.

  8. Dec 1, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue.

  9. Dec 1, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 1, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Testin; cosponsored by Representatives Kurtz, Sortwell, Hysell, Duchow, Kaufert, Murphy, Roe, Sinicki and Stroud

  2. Dec 1, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture and Revenue

  3. Dec 4, 2025 · Senate

    Senator Quinn added as a coauthor

  4. Dec 8, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Udell added as a cosponsor

  5. Dec 12, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Hong added as a cosponsor

  6. Dec 15, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a cosponsor

  7. Jan 8, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  8. Jan 13, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Tucker added as a cosponsor

  9. Jan 20, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Knodl added as a cosponsor

  10. Feb 2, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Testin

  11. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  13. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage as amended without recommendation, pursuant to Senate Rule 27 (4)(a), by Committee on Agriculture and Revenue, Ayes 4, Noes 4

  14. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  15. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote