Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 71

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: ratification of the Dietitian Licensure Compact. (FE)

Dietitian Interstate compact

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill ratifies and enters Wisconsin into the Dietitian Licensure Compact, which provides for the ability of a dietitian to become eligible to practice in other compact states. Significant provisions of the compact include the following:

1. The creation of a Dietitian Licensure Compact Commission, which includes the primary administrators of the licensure authorities of each member state. The commission has various powers and duties granted in the compact, including establishing bylaws, promulgating rules for the compact, appointing officers and hiring employees, and establishing and electing an executive committee. The commission may levy on and collect an annual assessment from each member state or impose fees on licensees to whom it grants a compact privilege to cover the cost of the operations and activities of the commission and its staff.

2. The ability for a dietitian to obtain a “compact privilege,” which allows a dietitian to practice dietetics in another compact state (remote state) if the dietitian satisfies certain criteria. The compact specifies a number of requirements in order for a dietitian to exercise a compact privilege, including holding an unencumbered dietitian license in a home state and paying any fees and meeting any jurisprudence requirements that may be imposed by a remote state. A dietitian practicing in a remote state under a compact privilege must adhere to the laws and regulations of that state. A remote state may, in accordance with that state’s laws, take adverse action against a licensee’s compact privilege within that state. If a dietitian’s license is encumbered, the dietitian loses the compact privilege in all remote states until certain criteria are satisfied. If a dietitian’s compact privilege in any remote state is removed, the dietitian may lose the compact privilege in all other remote states until certain criteria are satisfied.

3. The ability of member states to issue subpoenas that are enforceable in other states.

4. The creation of a coordinated data system containing licensure and disciplinary action information on dietitians. The compact requires member states to report adverse actions against licensees and to monitor the data system to determine whether adverse actions have been taken against licensees. A member state must submit a uniform data set to the data system on all individuals to whom the compact is applicable as required by the rules of the commission.

5. Provisions regarding resolutions of disputes between member states and between member and nonmember states, including a process for termination of a state’s membership in the compact if the state defaults on its obligations under the compact.

The compact becomes effective in this state upon its enactment in seven states. The compact provides that it may be amended upon enactment of an amendment by all member states. A state may withdraw from the compact by repealing the statute authorizing the compact, but the compact provides that a withdrawal does not take effect until 180 days after the effective date of that repeal.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Feyen (R) , Habush Sinykin (D) , Hesselbein (D) , James (R) , Marklein (R) , Ratcliff (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Testin (R)

23 cosponsors

Andraca (D) , B. Jacobson (R) , Bare (D) , Billings (D) , Brooks (R) , Brown (D) , Callahan (R) , Dittrich (R) , Drake (D) , Duchow (R) , Emerson (D) , Gundrum (R) , Joers (D) , Knodl (R) , Krug (R) , Mayadev (D) , Miresse (D) , O'Connor (R) , Spiros (R) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R) , Udell (D) , Vining (D)

Registered lobbying interests · 5

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 May 5, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 26, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Testin, Carpenter, Feyen, Habush Sinykin, Hesselbein, James, Marklein, Spreitzer and Ratcliff; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks, Bare, Callahan, Dittrich, Duchow, Gundrum, B. Jacobson, Joers, Knodl, Krug, O'Connor, Spiros, Subeck, Tittl, Udell and Vining

  2. Feb 26, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Mar 19, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Mayadev added as a cosponsor

  4. Apr 10, 2025 · Senate

    Senator Drake added as a coauthor

  5. Apr 15, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Miresse added as a cosponsor

  6. Apr 23, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. May 5, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. May 5, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. May 5, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. May 12, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. May 12, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Andraca added as a cosponsor

  12. Mar 6, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Brown added as a cosponsor

  13. Mar 10, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Billings added as a cosponsor

  14. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor

  15. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1