Senate Bill 786
Food allergen training and certificates of food protection practices, rules addressing food allergens, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Food, Public health, Restaurant
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 22, 2025
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue. The committee's chair at the time was Patrick Testin. Chairs decide which bills get a hearing. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill requires a restaurant operator or manager to receive food allergen training in order to obtain a certificate of food protection practices issued by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection. The bill also requires any DATCP rule that governs food processing plants and retail food establishments and that addresses food allergens to cover all major food allergens, including sesame.
Under current law, a person may not operate or manage a restaurant unless the person holds a valid certificate of food protection practices issued by DATCP (certificate). DATCP generally may issue a certificate to an individual who completes a DATCP-approved examination demonstrating that the individual has basic knowledge of food protection practices. DATCP must, by rule, specify standards for approval of examinations. A certificate is valid for five years and a certificate holder generally must pass the examination again to renew the certificate.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill requires that an applicant for issuance or renewal of a certificate also receive training in basic allergen awareness principles approved by DATCP. DATCP must, by rule, specify standards for this training, which must include instruction and assessment of knowledge as to all of the following topics: 1) food allergies and major food allergens; 2) the dangers of food allergies, symptoms of an allergic reaction to food, and responding to emergencies involving allergic reactions; 3) proper food hygiene and cleaning methods and preventing cross-contact and allergen contamination; 4) communication with customers and staff about allergens and dietary restrictions; 5) the importance of food labels and proper food preparation for customers with food allergies; and 6) understanding gluten, including sources of gluten, symptoms of gluten intolerance and celiac disease, the importance of gluten-free food preparation and handling, and proper cleaning methods to prevent gluten contamination.
Current law generally requires food processing plants and retail food establishments, such as restaurants, to be licensed by DATCP. An exception allows a person to sell home-canned food products without holding a food processing plant license if certain requirements are met, including that the food product is labeled with a list of ingredients. If any ingredient originates from milk, eggs, fish, crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, wheat, peanuts, or soybeans, the list of ingredients must include the common name of the ingredient.
Under current law, DATCP may promulgate rules to govern the operation of food processing plants and retail food establishments. These rules may include, among other topics, standards for facilities; the cleaning and maintenance of equipment and utensils; personnel sanitation; food handling and storage; and food sources and food labeling.
The bill requires any DATCP rule that governs the operation of food processing plants or retail food establishments and that addresses food allergens to cover all major food allergens. The bill defines a “major food allergen” in accordance with federal law to mean any of the following:
1. Milk, egg, fish, crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, wheat, peanuts, soybeans, and sesame.
2. With limited exceptions, a food ingredient that contains protein derived from a food specified in item 1.
The bill also requires a person who sells home-canned food products, as described above, to include on the food product’s label the name of each ingredient that is a major food allergen, including sesame.
Who's behind it
André Jacque, a Republican, is its .
3 more lawmakers .
See all 4 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (3)
- Rob Kreibich · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Dec 22, 2025
Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Revenue.
-
Dec 22, 2025
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor