Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 819

Administration of town road improvements under the local roads improvement program. (FE)

Topics: Regional planning, Road: Construction and repair, Transportation, Department of: Roads

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 14, 2026

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 822. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Transportation administers the Local Roads Improvement Program (LRIP) to assist political subdivisions in improving seriously deteriorating local roads by reimbursing political subdivisions for certain improvements. LRIP has several components, including an entitlement component, a discretionary component, a supplemental grant component, and an agricultural road component.

Among the features of the program, selection of improvements funded under the program is made by officials of the political subdivisions receiving the funding. DOT has promulgated administrative rules related to the administration of this facet of the program. These rules, among other things, require the creation of committees of political subdivisions that, among other powers, select the projects to be funded under the various components of LRIP.

Read the full summary

This bill provides additional details related to the administration of LRIP. First, the bill requires DOT to establish a statewide town road improvement committee (statewide town committee) made up of 15 members appointed by DOT, at least 12 being town officials. The statewide town committee is responsible for 1) establishing criteria for the selection of town road improvements to be funded under the discretionary and supplemental grant components of LRIP, 2) recommending projects for funding under those components, and 3) contracting with persons to act as project facilitators for projects under these components. Second, the bill requires the creation of county-level town road improvement committees (county-level town committees) consisting of a maximum of five town chairpersons or their designees in each county. These county-level town committees are responsible for the ranking of town road improvement projects for the county for which funding will be requested under the discretionary and supplemental grant components of LRIP. They also determine whether to use project facilitators provided by the statewide town committee or county highway commissioners for project facilitation. Third, the bill also establishes in each group of towns located in the geographic area of each Wisconsin Towns Association District a regional town road improvement committee consisting of the chairperson or designee of the chairperson from each county-level town committee located in the district. These committees are responsible for ranking the town road improvement projects in the district for which funding will be requested under the discretionary and supplemental grant components of LRIP.

The bill also sets a variety of deadlines, including:

1. No later than August 1 of each odd-numbered year, for release of application materials by DOT.

2. No later than November 15 of each odd-numbered year, for towns to notify county-level town committees of the projects selected for funding consideration.

3. No later than January 1 of each even-numbered year, for each county-level town committee to select projects for the entitlement component and rank projects fo the discretionary and supplemental grant components.

4. No later than January 15 of each even-numbered year, for the county-level town committee to provide completed applications for funding and grants to DOT.

5. No later than March 15 of each even-numbered year, for the statewide town committee to select improvements for funding under the discretionary and supplemental grant components.

6. No later than March 15 of each even-numbered year, for each town to enter into an agreement with DOT regarding improvements funded under the entitlement component.

7. No later than April 15 of each even-numbered year, for each town to enter into an agreement with DOT regarding improvements funded under the discretionary and supplemental grant components.

Current law limits improvements eligible for funding under LRIP to improvements with a projected design life of at least 10 years and provides additional limitations on funding double seal coat projects on town roads. This bill eliminates the additional limitations on funding double seal coat projects and provides that, in determining whether a project has a projected design life of at least 10 years, DOT may not rely on any categorical determination or generalized assumption regarding the performance or useful life of any paving material or construction method and may not determine that a project for which reimbursement is requested has a projected design life of less than 10 years unless the determination is based on a review of the particular project by a registered professional engineer or county highway commissioner.

Current law limits the town road improvement projects that may be performed by a county under LRIP. Among other requirements, such projects may only be awarded to a county upon receipt of insufficient bids from noncounty bidders. This bill also prohibits counties from 1) contracting for a town road improvement if the written and sealed estimate for that improvement was prepared by that county, 2) preparing a written and sealed estimate for a town road improvement in another county, and 3) commencing a town road improvement unless the town has made certain required notifications. Also under this bill, if a county violates any of these prohibitions or if a county enters into a contract with a town for an LRIP project and the county contracting requirements are not followed, the county is prohibited from performing LRIP projects for towns for two years.

Who's behind it

Howard Marklein, a Republican, is its ⁠.

18 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (18)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government vote on an amendment

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 2, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 2, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 17, 2026 to Mar 19, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Mar 16, 2026

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Mar 6, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Mar 2, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  6. Mar 2, 2026

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 12, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Jan 14, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government.

  9. Jan 14, 2026

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 14, 2026 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Green, Allen, Armstrong, Callahan, Gundrum, Hurd, Kitchens, Kreibich, Kurtz, Mursau, Novak, Spiros, Summerfield, Swearingen and Knodl

  2. Jan 14, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  3. Jan 28, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction

  4. Jan 30, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction

  5. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein

  6. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  7. Feb 12, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  8. Feb 12, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Mar 2, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  10. Mar 2, 2026 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  11. Mar 2, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  12. Mar 2, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  13. Mar 6, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Brown added as a cosponsor

  14. Mar 16, 2026 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Billings added as a cosponsor

  16. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor

  17. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote