Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session
Relating to: defining “direct result” for purposes of the affirmative defense for victims of human trafficking.
Court — Procedure Crime victim
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a victim of human trafficking or child sex trafficking has an affirmative defense for an offense committed as a direct result of the trafficking violation. In
State v. Kizer
, 2022 WI 58, the court held that an offense is “committed as a direct result” of the trafficking violation if there is a logical, causal connection between the offense and the trafficking such that the offense is not the result, in significant part, of other events, circumstances, or considerations apart from the trafficking violation. This bill codifies the holding and adds further conditions. Under the bill, for the affirmative defense to apply to an offense, there must be a logical, causal connection between the offense and the trafficking violation such that the offense is not the result, in significant part, of other events, circumstances, or considerations apart from the violation; the offense must occur in immediate proximity to the violation; and the offense must be necessary to escape from or prevent the violation.
Sponsors
Registered lobbying interests · 2
Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record
Full history
- Jan 15, 2026 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Wimberger; cosponsored by Representatives Tusler, Behnke, Dittrich, Kreibich and O'Connor
- Jan 15, 2026 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Feb 4, 2026 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2026 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1