Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Joint Resolution 94

Prohibiting governmental entity discrimination (second consideration)

Topics: Constitutional amendments: Second consideration, Discrimination, Discrimination in education, Discrimination in employment, Municipality, State agencies

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new proposal.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 9, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Adopted, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to adopt pursuant to ⁠”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same proposal was also filed in the Assembly as AJR 102. That version was adopted.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL This proposed constitutional amendment, to be given second consideration by the 2025 legislature for submittal to the voters in November 2026, was first considered by the 2023 legislature in 2023 Assembly Joint Resolution 109, which became 2023 Enrolled Joint Resolution 15.

This proposed constitutional amendment prohibits governmental entities in the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, public contracting, or public administration.

Read the full summary

PROCEDURE FOR SECOND CONSIDERATION When a proposed constitutional amendment is before the legislature on second consideration, any change in the text approved by the preceding legislature causes the proposed constitutional amendment to revert to first consideration status so that second consideration approval would have to be given by the next legislature before the proposal may be submitted to the people for ratification [see joint rule 57 (2)].

If the legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment on second consideration, it must also set the date for submitting the proposed constitutional amendment to the people for ratification and must determine the question or questions to appear on the ballot.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. All 4 are Republicans.

16 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 20 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (16)

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this proposal.

Senate Committee on Licensing vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 9, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the proposal died with it.

  2. Jan 12, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  3. Jan 9, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 3 to 2.

  4. Jan 7, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Oct 9, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs.

  6. Oct 9, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 9, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Nass, Wanggaard, Tomczyk and Kapenga; cosponsored by Representatives Murphy, Allen, Behnke, Dittrich, Donovan, Goeben, Gundrum, Knodl, Kreibich, Maxey, Melotik, Mursau, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk and Wichgers

  2. Oct 9, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

  3. Jan 7, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 9, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 9, 2026 · Senate

    Report adoption recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  6. Jan 9, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Jan 12, 2026 · Senate

    Representative B. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  8. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to adopt pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote