Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 859

Semiannual meetings of small winery cooperative wholesalers

Topics: Alcohol beverage: Regulation, Cooperative associations, Revenue, Department of, University of Wisconsin

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 20, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 16, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 20, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, between October 1 and December 31, 2008, the Department of Revenue (DOR) was authorized to issue intoxicating liquor wholesalers' permits to small winery cooperatives (cooperative wholesalers). DOR was limited to issuing a total of six such permits. Only wineries certified by DOR as small wineries can be members of a cooperative wholesaler. With respect to alcohol beverage products, a cooperative wholesaler can sell and distribute only the wine of its members, which can be sold or distributed only to retailers or other wholesalers.

Under current law, at least once every six months the board of directors of a cooperative wholesaler must meet in person with DOR and the University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives (CFC). Current law specifies various requirements related to these meetings, including that publicly available reports be prepared by DOR and the CFC as a result of these meetings.

Read the full summary

This bill eliminates this meeting and report requirement.

Who's behind it

7 representatives are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 14 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Rural Economic Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 21, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  3. Apr 21, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  5. Apr 15, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Apr 15, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  7. Apr 7, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Mar 30, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Mar 23, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Mar 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rural Economic Development.

  11. Mar 16, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Garthwaite, Hilgenberg, Soletski, Berceau, Bies, Kerkman and Mursau;Cosponsored by Senators Holperin, Coggs, Cowles, Grothman, A. Lasee, Lassa and Schultz

  2. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rural Economic Development

  3. Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Rural Economic Development, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  8. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:22 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  10. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  17. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote