Bills · 2013-2014 Regular Session
Relating to: reasonable accommodation of any condition of an employee that is related to pregnancy or childbirth and of an employee's inability to adequately undertake the job-related responsibilities of a particular job because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related condition.
Discrimination in employment Employment Maternal and infant care Medical assistance
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex, including
discrimination against any woman on the basis of pregnancy or a related medical
condition. Current law also prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of
disability, including refusing to reasonably accommodate an employee's disability,
but the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) has held that pregnancy and
pregnancy-related medical conditions are covered under the sex discrimination, and
not the disability discrimination, provisions of the Fair Employment Law.
Goodrich
v. Duro Paper Bag Mfg. Co, Inc.
(LIRC 02/14/92).
This bill provides that employment discrimination on the basis of sex includes
all of the following:
1. Refusing to reasonably accommodate any condition, including a medical
condition of an employee that is related to pregnancy or childbirth, or to reasonably
accommodate an employee's inability to adequately undertake the job-related
responsibilities of a particular job because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related
condition that is known to the employer, including the need to express breast milk
for a nursing child (lactation), unless the employer can demonstrate that the
accommodation would pose a hardship on the employer's program, enterprise, or
business.
2. Requiring an employee to take family, medical, or any other type of leave as
a reasonable accommodation of an employee's inability to adequately undertake the
job-related responsibilities of a particular job because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a
related condition that is known to the employer, including lactation, unless the
employer can demonstrate that permitting the employee to remain at work would
pose a hardship on the employer's program, enterprise, or business.
Specifically, the bill requires an employer to explore with an employee who
requests a reasonable accommodation because of pregnancy, childbirth, or a related
condition that is known to the employer, including lactation (reasonable
accommodation), all possible means of providing the reasonable accommodation,
including changing the employee's job responsibilities, changing the employee's
work hours, relocating the employee's work area, providing mechanical or electronic
aids to the employee, transferring the employee to a less strenuous or less hazardous
job, or, subject to the prohibition against requiring an employee to take leave,
providing family, medical, or any other type of leave to the employee.
Further, the bill requires an employer, on the request of an employee for a
transfer to a less strenuous or less hazardous job as a reasonable accommodation, to
transfer the employee for a period up to the duration of the employee's inability to
adequately undertake the job-related responsibilities of a particular job if: 1) the
employer has a policy or practice, or is subject to a collective bargaining agreement,
Sponsors
Introduced by: Barnes (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Hulsey (D) , Jacque (R) , Johnson (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kahl (D) , Kessler (D) , Mason (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pasch (D) , Riemer (D) , Ringhand (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wachs (D) , Wright (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D)
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 58
Failed 38–58 Feb 18, 2014 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 22, 2013 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Genrich, Jacque, Barnes, Berceau, Billings, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Hulsey, Johnson, Jorgensen, Kahl, Kessler, Mason, Milroy, Ohnstad, Pasch, Riemer, Ringhand, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Wachs, Wright, Young and Zamarripa; cosponsored by Senators Harris, L. Taylor, Schultz, Miller, Lehman, Lassa, C. Larson and Hansen
- Nov 22, 2013 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor
- Feb 18, 2014 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Labor and take up, Ayes 38, Noes 58
- Apr 8, 2014 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1