Assembly Bill 321
Reading instruction in public schools and private schools participating in parental choice programs, an early literacy assessment and intervention program, providing an exemption from rule-making procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Jul 20, 2023. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 12, 2023
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jun 21, 2023
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 25 to 7
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2023 Wisconsin Act 20
Latest entry in the official record, Jul 20, 2023: “Published 7-20-2023”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Early Literacy Instruction Office of Literacy and literacy coaches This bill establishes the Office of Literacy in the Department of Public Instruction, to be led by a director who is appointed by the state superintendent of public instruction after consultation with the Council on Early Literacy Curricula and subject to the advice and consent of the senate and who serves at the pleasure of the state superintendent. Under the bill, the Office of Literacy must establish and supervise a literacy coaching program to improve literacy outcomes in this state.
Specifically, the Office of Literacy, in consultation with cooperative educational service agencies, must contract for up to 64 full-time equivalent literacy coaches.
Read the full summary Show less
Literacy coaches must demonstrate knowledge and expertise in science-based early literacy instruction and instructional practices and have instructional experience in grades kindergarten to 12. In addition, the Office of Literacy must provide ongoing training on science-based early literacy instruction and instructional practices and supervision to literacy coaches and must prohibit literacy coaches from using three-cueing.
The bill requires the Office of Literacy to assign one-half of the literacy coaches to schools based on pupil scores on the third grade reading assessment and one-half of the literacy coaches to schools that request early literacy support. The latter half of the literacy coaches must be dispersed evenly among cooperative educational service agency regions. However, the bill prohibits assigning more than a total of 10 literacy coaches to a first class city school district and more than a total of four literacy coaches to a school district that is not a first class city school district and requires that no fewer than three literacy coaches be assigned to each cooperative educational service agency region. Additionally, the Office of Literacy must ensure that a school to which a literacy coach is assigned does not request or require that the literacy coach perform duties outside the individual's role as a literacy coach, as described in the bill.
Under the bill, the Office of Literacy must submit an annual report to the Joint Committee on Finance on various aspects of the literacy coaching program during the previous school year, including the number of literacy coaches, the number of schools that were assigned a literacy coach, pupil scores on reading readiness assessments and the third grade reading assessment in those schools, and information on the training provided to the literacy coaches.
Finally, under the bill, the Office of Literacy and the literacy coaching program sunset on July 1, 2028.
Council on Early Literacy Curricula; recommended curricula and instructional materials The bill creates the Council on Early Literacy Curricula in DPI to recommend literacy curricula and instructional materials for use in grades kindergarten to three. The council consists of nine members who have knowledge of or experience with science-based early literacy instruction and literacy curricula. Under the bill, the initial members of the council are appointed jointly by the state superintendent of public instruction, the assembly speaker, and the senate majority leader, and if the initial members are not appointed jointly within 45 days, each appointing authority must each appoint three members. Under the bill, after the initial appointments are made, the membership of the council is made up of three members appointed by the state superintendent, three members appointed by the assembly speaker, and three members appointed by the senate majority leader.
Under the bill, the Council on Early Literacy Curricula must annually make recommendations for early literacy curricula and instructional materials for use in the following school year. The council's recommendations for curricula and instructional materials must include all of the components of science-based early reading instruction and may not include three-cueing. The bill defines “science-based early reading instruction” as instruction that is systematic and explicit and consists of the following components: phonological awareness; phonemic awareness; phonics; building background knowledge; oral language development;
vocabulary building; instruction in writing; instruction in comprehension; and reading fluency. Under the bill, “three-cueing” means any model, including the model referred to as meaning, structure, and visual cues, or MSV, of teaching a pupil to read based on meaning, structure and syntax, and visual cues or memory.
Under the bill, annually, upon receiving recommendations from the Council on Early Literacy Curricula, DPI must submit proposed recommendations on early literacy curricula and instructional materials to the Joint Committee on Finance.
DPI may not adopt the recommendations unless JCF approves the recommendations. For purposes of the recommendations for the 2024-25 school year, the initial recommendations made by the council, the bill requires that proposed recommendations be submitted to JCF by November 1, 2023. Under the bill, DPI must maintain a list of adopted recommendations for early literacy curricula and instructional materials on its website.
Beginning on January 1, 2024, if a school board, charter school, or private school participating in a parental choice program chooses to adopt an early literacy curriculum, the school board, charter school, or private school participating in a parental choice program must adopt an early literacy curriculum recommended by DPI. The bill also requires DPI to award grants to school boards, independent charter schools, and private schools participating in a choice program that adopt a recommended early literacy curriculum on or after January 1, 2024. Under the bill, the amount of the grant is 50 percent of the cost to purchase the recommended literacy curriculum and instructional materials.
Beginning on the date the bill becomes law, school boards, charter schools, and private schools participating in a parental choice program are prohibited from purchasing curricula and instructional materials that incorporate three-cueing.
Beginning in the 2024-25 school year, the bill also prohibits public schools, including charter schools, and private schools participating in a parental choice program from providing instruction to pupils in grades kindergarten to three that incorporates three-cueing in the core reading curriculum or in supplemental materials, including materials used for reading intervention.
Teacher preparatory programs and licenses to teach; instruction to teach reading Under current law, the state superintendent of public instruction is required to prescribe standards, requirements, and procedures for the approval of teacher preparatory programs that lead to a license issued by DPI. Under the bill, to be approved by the state superintendent, a teacher preparatory program must demonstrate that it provides instruction that prepares teachers to teach reading and language arts using science-based early reading instruction and that it does not provide instruction on teaching reading and language arts that incorporates three-cueing.
Under current law, DPI may not issue a license that authorizes the license holder to teach reading or language arts in a prekindergarten class or in grades kindergarten to six unless the individual has successfully completed instruction preparing the individual to teach reading using appropriate instructional methods, including phonics. Current law defines “phonics” as a method of teaching beginners to read and pronounce words by learning the phonetic value of letters, letter groups, and syllables.
Under the bill, DPI may not issue a license that authorizes the license holder to teach reading or language arts in a prekindergarten class or in grades kindergarten to six unless the individual has successfully completed instruction preparing the individual to teach reading using science-based early reading instruction, as defined in the bill, that includes phonics and that does not include three-cueing, as defined in the bill. The bill defines “phonics” as the study of the relationships between sounds and words; this includes alphabetic principle, decoding, orthographic knowledge, encoding, and fluency.
Professional development training Under the bill, school boards and charter school operators must ensure that all kindergarten to third grade teachers, principals of schools that offer grades kindergarten to three, and reading specialists receive professional development training in science-based early literacy instruction by no later than July 1, 2025.
Under the bill, the mandatory professional development training is the same professional development for which American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 federal funding was allocated. Specifically, the professional development training must be Voyager Sopris Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS) or another program endorsed by the Center for Effective Reading Instruction as an accredited independent teacher training program and must be provided by the Leadership in Literacy Institute or another provider who meets various requirements specified in the bill. The bill also requires the same professional development training for all faculty or academic staff of the University of Wisconsin System who teach a course that includes curriculum in reading instruction designed for kindergarten to third grade teachers, elementary school principals, or reading specialists.
Third grade retention policies Under the bill, by January 1, 2025, DPI must establish, by rule, a model policy for promoting third grade pupils to the fourth grade. Under the bill, the model policy must include various components, including 1) a requirement that a pupil who scores in the lowest proficiency category on the third grade reading assessment be retained in the third grade, 2) a good cause exception for certain pupils, 3) a requirement that the school board provide intensive instructional services, progress monitoring, and supports to a pupil who is retained under the policy, 4) written notice to the pupil's parent, and 5) an intensive summer reading program for pupils who scored in the lowest proficiency category of the third grade reading assessment.
By July 1, 2025, the bill requires school boards, independent charter schools, and private schools participating in a parental choice program to adopt written policies for promoting a third grade pupil to the fourth grade that include all of the components that are required to be in DPI's model policy. Additionally, beginning on September 1, 2028, school boards, independent charter schools, and private schools participating in a parental choice program are prohibited from promoting a third grade pupil unless the pupil complies with their respective promotion policy. Under current law, school boards, independent charter schools, and private schools participating in a parental choice program must adopt written policies for promoting pupils from grade four to grade five and from grade eight to grade nine and are prohibited from promoting a pupil unless the pupil complies with the applicable promotion policy.
School district and school report cards The bill requires DPI to include in the annual school district and school accountability report, commonly referred to as school and school district report cards, the number and percentage of pupils who scored in the lowest proficiency category on the third grade reading assessment. The bill requires this information for school districts and schools that offer third grade. Under the bill, this information must first be included in the report cards for the 2023-24 school year that are published in the fall of the 2024-25 school year.
Reading Readiness Assessments and interventions Under current law, school boards and independent charter schools must annually assess pupils enrolled in four-year-old kindergarten to second grade for reading readiness using an assessment of literacy fundamentals selected by the school board or independent charter school. The selected reading readiness assessment must evaluate whether a pupil possesses phonemic awareness and letter sound knowledge. Current law requires a school board or independent charter school to provide interventions or remedial reading services to a pupil if the reading readiness assessment indicates that the pupil is at risk of reading difficulty with interventions or remedial reading services. Current law does not define “at-risk.” Beginning in the 2024-25 school year, the bill requires school boards and independent charter schools to assess the early literacy skills of pupils in four-year-old kindergarten to third grade using various assessments and to create a personal reading plan for each pupil in five-year-old kindergarten to third grade who is identified as at-risk based on a universal screening assessment or diagnostic assessment. Under the bill, “at-risk” means the pupil scored below the 25th percentile on an applicable screening assessment, as indicated by the screening assessment publisher.
Fundamental skills screening assessments; four-year-old kindergarten Under the bill, beginning in the 2024-25 school year, school boards and independent charter schools must screen all pupils enrolled in four-year-old kindergarten at least two times each school year using a fundamental skills screening selected by DPI. The bill specifies that the first screening assessment must occur before the 46th day of the school term and that both screenings be completed by no later than 45 days before the last day of school. The bill defines a “fundamental skills screening assessment” as an assessment that evaluates a pupil's phonemic awareness and letter sound knowledge.
Universal screening and diagnostic assessments and interventions Required universal screening assessments Under the bill, beginning in the 2024-25 school year, school boards and independent charter schools must screen all pupils enrolled in five-year-old kindergarten to third grade at least three times each school year using a universal screening assessment selected by DPI. The bill specifies that the first universal screening must occur before the 46th day of the school term, the second universal screening must occur in the middle of the school term, and the third universal screening must occur no later than 45 days before the last day of school. The bill defines a “universal screening assessment” as an assessment that evaluates a pupil's skill in phonemic awareness, decoding skills, alphabet knowledge, letter sound knowledge, and oral vocabulary.
Required diagnostic assessments Under the bill, beginning in the 2024-25 school year, school boards and independent charter schools must screen a pupil enrolled in five-year-old kindergarten to third grade using a diagnostic assessment 1) if the pupil is identified as at-risk based on the first universal screening of the school year, by no later than the second Friday in November; 2) if the pupil is identified as at-risk based on the second universal screening of the school year, within 10 days after the universal screening was administered; and 3) if a teacher or parent suspects the pupil has characteristics of dyslexia and submits a request for a diagnostic assessment, within 20 days of submitting the request. The bill defines a “diagnostic assessment” as a tool that includes an assessment that evaluates a pupil's skill in the skills assessed in a universal screening assessment as well as rapid naming, phonological awareness, word recognition, spelling, vocabulary, listening comprehension, and when developmentally appropriate, oral reading fluency and reading comprehension, and provides the pupil's parent the opportunity to complete a family history survey about learning difficulties in the pupil's family. If a pupil is identified as at-risk based on a diagnostic assessment, the bill requires the school board or independent charter school to provide information to the pupil's parent about how to make a special education referral.
Personal reading plan; at-risk pupils If a pupil is identified as at-risk based on a universal screening assessment or a diagnostic assessment, the bill requires the school board or independent charter school to create a personal reading plan for the pupil. Under the bill, a personal reading plan must include various components related to addressing the pupil's specific early literacy deficiencies, including interventions that will be provided to the pupil, how the pupil's progress will be monitored, and strategies the pupil's parent is encouraged to use to help the pupil achieve grade-level literacy skills. The bill further requires the school board or independent charter school to 1) provide the interventions included in the personal reading plan to the pupil, as soon as practicable; 2) monitor the pupil's progress at least weekly; 3) provide a copy of the personal reading plan to the pupil's parent; 4) obtain a copy of the reading plan signed by the pupil's parent; and 5) after 10 weeks of providing the interventions required in the personal reading plan, notify the pupil's parent of the pupil's progress.
Selected and approved early literacy assessments Under the bill, by July 15, 2024, DPI must select a fundamental skills screening assessment, select a universal screening assessment, and establish and maintain a list of approved diagnostic assessments on its website. DPI must also submit a list of the selected and approved assessments to the appropriate standing committees of the legislature. Under the bill, DPI may only approve an early literacy assessment if the assessment has a sensitivity rate of at least 70 percent, has a specificity rate of at least 80 percent, and includes a growth measure.
State funding for early literacy assessments Under the bill, DPI must pay each school board and independent charter school for the per pupil cost of each early literacy assessment required to be administered under the bill. However, beginning in the 2025-26 school year, a school board or independent charter school is eligible for the state funding provided in the bill only if the school board or independent charter school submits an annual report to DPI and in that report indicates that the school board or charter school used only selected or approved early literacy assessments in the previous school year. Under current law, DPI pays school boards and independent charter schools for the per pupil cost of the reading readiness assessment selected by the school board or independent charter school.
Parent notification requirements Under the bill, a school board or independent charter school must provide a pupil's results on an early literacy assessment to the pupil's parent by no later than 15 days after the applicable assessment is scored. The results provided to the parent must be in the parent's native language and must include the pupil's overall score, the pupil's score on each literacy skill category assessed by the assessment, the pupil's percentile rank score, if available, the score on the assessment that indicates a pupil is at-risk, and a plain language explanation of the literacy skills that were evaluated by the assessment. In addition, if a school board or independent charter school is required to screen a pupil using a diagnostic assessment, the school board or independent charter school must provide the pupil's parent with information related to characteristics of dyslexia, including information about the common indicators of characteristics of dyslexia and appropriate interventions and accommodations for pupils with characteristics of dyslexia.
The bill also requires each school board and independent charter school to have an early literacy remediation plan. An early literacy remediation plan must include information about assessments used to identify at-risk pupils, the interventions used to address characteristics of dyslexia, and monitoring pupil progress related to early literacy skills. Under the bill, each school district and independent charter school must post its early literacy remediation plan on its website.
Down Down /2023/related/proposals/ab321 true proposaltext /2023/related/proposals/ab321 proposaltext/2023/REG/AB321 proposaltext/2023/REG/AB321 section true Menu » 2023 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » AB321: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {
$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });
});
Who's behind it
31 representatives are its . All 31 are Republicans.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 38 names Hide the names
Authors (31)
- Scott Allen · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Elijah Behnke · Republican, Assembly
- Amy Binsfeld · Republican, Assembly
- Janel Brandtjen · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Donovan · Republican, Assembly
- Cindi Duchow · Republican, Assembly
- Chanz Green · Republican, Assembly
- Rick Gundrum · Republican, Assembly
- Gus Gustafson · Republican, Assembly
- Karen Hurd · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Gae Magnafici · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Maxey · Republican, Assembly
- Tom Michalski · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Amanda Nedweski · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Nik Rettinger · Republican, Assembly
- Jessie Rodriguez · Republican, Assembly
- Donna Rozar · Republican, Assembly
- Peter Schmidt · Republican, Assembly
- Pat Snyder · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- David Steffen · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Summerfield · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Wittke · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (7)
- Julian Bradley · Republican, Senate
- John Jagler · Republican, Senate
- John Macco · Republican, Assembly
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
- Eric Wimberger · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on State Affairs vote on an amendment
Passed, 9 to 5 · Jun 15, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on State Affairs vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 5 · Jun 15, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 67 to 27 · Jun 21, 2023 · 2 didn't vote
See how each of the 96 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (67)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Amy Binsfeld (R, 27)
- Angie Sapik (R, 73)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Considine (D, 81)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Donna Rozar (R, 69)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Ellen Schutt (R, 31)
- Gae Magnafici (R, 28)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- James Edming (R, 87)
- Janel Brandtjen (R, 22)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Macco (R, 88)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jon Plumer (R, 42)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Loren Oldenburg (R, 96)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Nik Rettinger (R, 83)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Peter Schmidt (R, 6)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Johnson (R, 33)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Sue Conley (D, 44)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Terry Katsma (R, 26)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tom Michalski (R, 13)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Ty Bodden (R, 59)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
No (27)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jimmy Anderson (D, 47)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- Kristina Shelton (D, 90)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Marisabel Cabrera (D, 9)
- Melissa Ratcliff (D, 16)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Samba Baldeh (D, 48)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
Didn't vote (2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Failed, 34 to 60 · Jun 21, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to refer to committee on State Affairs, Ayes 34, Noes 60”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Jun 27, 2023
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 25 to 7 · Jun 28, 2023 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (25)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Cory Tomczyk (R, 29)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (7)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Melissa Agard (D, 16)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Didn't vote (1)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Jul 20, 2023
The new law was published.
-
Jul 20, 2023
The governor signed it. It became 2023 Wisconsin Act 20.
-
Jul 13, 2023
Sent to the governor.
-
Jun 28, 2023
The Senate passed it too, 25 to 7.
-
Jun 27, 2023
“Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jun 27, 2023
Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.
-
Jun 22, 2023
The Senate received it.
-
Jun 21, 2023
The Assembly passed it, 67 to 27.
-
Jun 21, 2023
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Jun 21, 2023
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jun 15, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jun 15, 2023
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 5.
-
Jun 15, 2023
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 14, 2023
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jun 13, 2023
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 12, 2023
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.
-
Jun 12, 2023
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 12, 2023 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Kitchens, Wittke, Binsfeld, Nedweski, Duchow, Dittrich, Allen, Armstrong, Behnke, Brandtjen, Donovan, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Hurd, Krug, Magnafici, Maxey, Michalski, Murphy, O'Connor, Penterman, Rettinger, Rodriguez, Rozar, Schmidt, Snyder, Spiros, Steffen, Summerfield and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Stroebel, Jagler, Bradley, Wimberger and Marklein
- Jun 12, 2023 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- Jun 13, 2023 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jun 14, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Schraa added as a coauthor
- Jun 15, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kitchens
- Jun 15, 2023 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 15, 2023 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 15, 2023 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 5
- Jun 15, 2023 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 9, Noes 5
- Jun 15, 2023 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 15, 2023 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-21-2023 by Committee on Rules
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Representative Macco added as a coauthor
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Kitchens
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Refused to refer to committee on State Affairs, Ayes 34, Noes 60
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 67, Noes 27, Paired 2
- Jun 21, 2023 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 22, 2023 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jun 27, 2023 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Jun 27, 2023 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jun 27, 2023 · Senate
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jun 27, 2023 · Senate
Placed on calendar 6-28-2023 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Jun 28, 2023 · Senate
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1)
- Jun 28, 2023 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jun 28, 2023 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 28, 2023 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Jun 28, 2023 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 25, Noes 7
- Jun 28, 2023 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 29, 2023 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Jun 29, 2023 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 1)
- Jun 29, 2023 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 6-29-2023
- Jul 13, 2023 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 7-13-2023 by directive of the Speaker
- Jul 20, 2023 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 7-19-2023. 2023 Wisconsin Act 20
- Jul 20, 2023 · Assembly
Published 7-20-2023
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote