Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 192

Fatality review teams and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Topics: Death, Health Services, Department of: Administration, Open meeting (Governmental), Privacy

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 2, 2026. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 15, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 19, 2026

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Mar 17, 2026

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2025 Wisconsin Act 148

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 2, 2026: “Published 4-3-2026”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 192. That version died when the session ended.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill establishes fatality review teams under state law. Current law does not address fatality review teams, though several types of such teams currently exist in Wisconsin based on voluntary efforts primarily organized by counties, with state-level technical assistance available for certain types of teams.

Under the bill, a fatality review team is defined as a multidisciplinary and multiagency team reviewing one or more types of death among children or adults and developing recommendations to prevent future deaths of similar circumstances. The bill generally governs a team’s responsibilities, ability to access certain records, confidentiality requirements, and disclosure of information.

Read the full summary

Duties and authority of the Department of Health Services Under the bill, the Department of Health Services must establish a fatality review program comprised of local fatality review teams established at the option of a municipality, a county, a local health department, or a tribal health department, or a combination of these entities. The bill also authorizes, but does not require, DHS to create state fatality review teams.

The bill requires DHS to perform various duties, in consultation with other state agencies as appropriate, such as: 1) facilitate local team development; 2) identify training needs and make available training resources; 3) provide technical assistance and support; 4) in the absence of a local team or upon request, assign review of deaths to a state fatality review team, if established; 5) educate the public on causes and recommendations for prevention of reviewable deaths; and 6) provide information to the legislature, state agencies, and local communities on the need for modifications to law, policy, or practice. The bill allows DHS to contract with an entity to perform any of its duties under the bill.

Under the bill, DHS or its contracted entity must create and make available to fatality review teams a confidentiality agreement for use by team members to ensure confidentiality consistent with the bill’s provisions. The bill requires DHS to promulgate administrative rules to develop and implement a standardized form for review of suicide deaths, and allows DHS to promulgate rules to develop and implement standardized forms for other types of reviewable deaths. The bill further grants general rule-making authority to DHS to implement the bill’s provisions.

Fatality review teams The bill contains general provisions governing any type of fatality review team. The bill identifies examples of the types of deaths that may constitute a reviewable death, including overdose, suicide, maternal death occurring during or within a year of a pregnancy, or any unexpected or unintentional death of a child, among others. The bill also provides a non-exhaustive list of potential team members.

Under the bill, a fatality review team has the purpose of gathering information about reviewable deaths to examine risk factors and understand how deaths may be prevented, through identifying recommendations for cross-sector, system-level policy and practice changes, and promoting cooperation and coordination among the agencies involved in understanding causes of reviewable deaths or in providing services to surviving family members.

If established, each fatality review team must: 1) establish and implement team protocols; 2) collect and maintain data; 3) create strategies and track implementation of prevention recommendations; and 4) evaluate the team’s process, interagency collaboration, and implementation of recommendations. The bill requires teams to assign, as appropriate for a specific review, a team member to complete any standardized form developed by DHS, and to enter data regarding each reviewable death into any secure database designated by DHS or its contracted entity.

Record access and confidentiality The bill authorizes a fatality review team to access records from a variety of sources, such as certain state agencies, law enforcement, medical examiners and coroners, health care providers, social or human service agencies, schools, and the prescription drug monitoring program, among others, subject to certain restrictions under the bill and current law.

Information and records provided to or created by a fatality review team are confidential, subject to limited exceptions provided under the bill, and are not subject to Wisconsin’s public records laws. The bill requires team members, and other individuals invited to attend a team meeting, to sign a confidentiality agreement before participating in or attending a fatality review team meeting. The bill prohibits team members, persons in attendance at team meetings, and others providing records to teams from testifying in any civil or criminal action as to the information specifically obtained through participation in the team’s meeting .

The bill authorizes disclosure of information if such disclosure serves a team’s purpose and certain other conditions are met, such as the information does not allow for identification of individuals and does not contain conclusory information attributing fault. The bill further specifies that a team’s information and records are not subject to discovery or subpoena, or admissible as evidence, in a civil or criminal action, unless obtained independently from a team’s review. The bill also provides that a person participating in a fatality review team is immune from civil or criminal liability for any good faith act or omission in connection with providing information or recommendations.

The bill exempts fatality review team meetings from Wisconsin’s open meetings law. The bill allows for public meetings to share summary findings and recommendations, but limits the types of information that may be disclosed in public meetings.

Who's behind it

5 representatives are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Local Government vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 3 · Feb 5, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Local Government vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 3 · Feb 5, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 16, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 2, 2026

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 2, 2026

    The governor signed it. It became 2025 Wisconsin Act 148.

  3. Apr 1, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 19, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  5. Mar 17, 2026

    The Senate passed it too.

  6. Mar 16, 2026

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Mar 6, 2026 to Mar 10, 2026

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  8. Feb 25, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Feb 23, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  10. Feb 19, 2026

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Feb 19, 2026

    The Assembly adopted it.

  12. Feb 5, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Feb 5, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 3.

  14. Sep 17, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Sep 10, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. May 15, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Apr 15, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Local Government.

  18. Apr 15, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Moses, Callahan, Snyder, O'Connor and Mursau; cosponsored by Senator James

  2. Apr 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Local Government

  3. May 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  6. Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Moses

  7. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 5, 2026 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  9. Feb 5, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  10. Feb 5, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Representative Moses

  12. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:08 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  13. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  14. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adopted

  15. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Feb 23, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Feb 25, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  21. Feb 25, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Mar 6, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Brown added as a coauthor

  23. Mar 10, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Billings added as a coauthor

  24. Mar 16, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  25. Mar 16, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  26. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  27. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  29. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  30. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Mar 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  32. Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Subeck added as a coauthor

  33. Mar 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Emerson added as a coauthor

  34. Mar 26, 2026 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Substitute Amendment 2)

  35. Mar 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-26-2026

  36. Apr 1, 2026 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-1-2026

  37. Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-2-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 148

  38. Apr 2, 2026 · Assembly

    Published 4-3-2026

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote