Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 192

Fatality review teams and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Topics: Death, Health Services, Department of: Administration, Open meeting (Governmental), Privacy

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 14, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 192. That version became law.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill establishes fatality review teams under state law. Current law does not address fatality review teams, though several types of such teams currently exist in Wisconsin based on voluntary efforts primarily organized by counties, with state-level technical assistance available for certain types of teams.

Under the bill, a fatality review team is defined as a multidisciplinary and multiagency team reviewing one or more types of death among children or adults and developing recommendations to prevent future deaths of similar circumstances. The bill generally governs a team’s responsibilities, ability to access certain records, confidentiality requirements, and disclosure of information.

Read the full summary

Duties and authority of the Department of Health Services Under the bill, the Department of Health Services must establish a fatality review program comprised of local fatality review teams established at the option of a municipality, a county, a local health department, or a tribal health department, or a combination of these entities. The bill also authorizes, but does not require, DHS to create state fatality review teams.

The bill requires DHS to perform various duties, in consultation with other state agencies as appropriate, such as: 1) facilitate local team development; 2) identify training needs and make available training resources; 3) provide technical assistance and support; 4) in the absence of a local team or upon request, assign review of deaths to a state fatality review team, if established; 5) educate the public on causes and recommendations for prevention of reviewable deaths; and 6) provide information to the legislature, state agencies, and local communities on the need for modifications to law, policy, or practice. The bill allows DHS to contract with an entity to perform any of its duties under the bill.

Under the bill, DHS or its contracted entity must create and make available to fatality review teams a confidentiality agreement for use by team members to ensure confidentiality consistent with the bill’s provisions. The bill requires DHS to promulgate administrative rules to develop and implement a standardized form for review of suicide deaths, and allows DHS to promulgate rules to develop and implement standardized forms for other types of reviewable deaths. The bill further grants general rule-making authority to DHS to implement the bill’s provisions.

Fatality review teams The bill contains general provisions governing any type of fatality review team. The bill identifies examples of the types of deaths that may constitute a reviewable death, including overdose, suicide, maternal death occurring during or within a year of a pregnancy, or any unexpected or unintentional death of a child, among others. The bill also provides a non-exhaustive list of potential team members.

Under the bill, a fatality review team has the purpose of gathering information about reviewable deaths to examine risk factors and understand how deaths may be prevented, through identifying recommendations for cross-sector, system-level policy and practice changes, and promoting cooperation and coordination among the agencies involved in understanding causes of reviewable deaths or in providing services to surviving family members.

If established, each fatality review team must: 1) establish and implement team protocols; 2) collect and maintain data; 3) create strategies and track implementation of prevention recommendations; and 4) evaluate the team’s process, interagency collaboration, and implementation of recommendations. The bill requires teams to assign, as appropriate for a specific review, a team member to complete any standardized form developed by DHS, and to enter data regarding each reviewable death into any secure database designated by DHS or its contracted entity.

Record access and confidentiality The bill authorizes a fatality review team to access records from a variety of sources, such as certain state agencies, law enforcement, medical examiners and coroners, health care providers, social or human service agencies, schools, and the prescription drug monitoring program, among others, subject to certain restrictions under the bill and current law.

Information and records provided to or created by a fatality review team are confidential, subject to limited exceptions provided under the bill, and are not subject to Wisconsin’s public records laws. The bill requires team members, and other individuals invited to attend a team meeting, to sign a confidentiality agreement before participating in or attending a fatality review team meeting. The bill prohibits team members, persons in attendance at team meetings, and others providing records to teams from testifying in any civil or criminal action as to the information specifically obtained through participation in the team’s meeting .

The bill authorizes disclosure of information if such disclosure serves a team’s purpose and certain other conditions are met, such as the information does not allow for identification of individuals and does not contain conclusory information attributing fault. The bill further specifies that a team’s information and records are not subject to discovery or subpoena, or admissible as evidence, in a civil or criminal action, unless obtained independently from a team’s review. The bill also provides that a person participating in a fatality review team is immune from civil or criminal liability for any good faith act or omission in connection with providing information or recommendations.

The bill exempts fatality review team meetings from Wisconsin’s open meetings law. The bill allows for public meetings to share summary findings and recommendations, but limits the types of information that may be disclosed in public meetings.

Who's behind it

Jesse James, a Republican, is its ⁠.

10 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (10)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Jan 27, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 6, 2026 to Mar 19, 2026

    4 more representatives signed on in support.

  3. Jan 27, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  4. Jan 14, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Sep 17, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  6. May 8, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Apr 14, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health.

  8. Apr 14, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 14, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator James; cosponsored by Representatives Moses, Callahan, Snyder, O'Connor and Mursau

  2. Apr 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Sep 17, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  5. Jan 14, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  8. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator James

  10. Feb 23, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senator James

  11. Mar 6, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Brown added as a cosponsor

  12. Mar 10, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Billings added as a cosponsor

  13. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Subeck added as a cosponsor

  14. Mar 19, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor

  15. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote