Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 225

Determination of where a defendant resides or does substantial business for purposes of venue

Topics: Business, Court: Procedure

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 27, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 23, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 19, 2025

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 11, 2026

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 27, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 226. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, with certain exceptions, venue in civil actions or special proceedings must be in either the county where the claim arose, the county where the real or tangible personal property, or some part thereof, which is the subject of the claim is situated, the county where a defendant resides or does substantial business, or, if none of the foregoing apply, in any county designated by the plaintiff. This bill provides that, for the purposes of determining whether a county is a proper venue based on where a defendant resides or does substantial business, a court may not consider the participation of a party joined to the civil action or special proceeding because their joinder is needed for just and complete adjudication, as provided under current law, or a party joined to the civil action or special proceeding whose joinder is permissive, as provided under current law. Further, this bill provides that, for the purposes of determining where a business entity resides or does substantial business, a business entity shall be deemed to reside in the place of incorporation or organization and shall be deemed to do substantial business only in the county of its principal place of business.

Who's behind it

6 representatives are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (4)

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Insurance vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 2 · Oct 16, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Insurance, Ayes 7, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 9, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 27, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Feb 11, 2026

    The Senate passed it too.

  4. Feb 9, 2026

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  5. Nov 20, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  6. Nov 20, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  7. Nov 19, 2025

    The Assembly passed it.

  8. Oct 16, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Oct 16, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 2.

  10. May 8, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  11. May 8, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Apr 23, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Insurance.

  13. Apr 23, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Duchow, Allen, Brooks, Kreibich, Maxey and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Marklein and Quinn

  2. Apr 23, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance

  3. May 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. May 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Steffen added as a coauthor

  5. Oct 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Insurance, Ayes 7, Noes 2

  7. Oct 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Nov 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-19-2025 by Committee on Rules

  9. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Nov 20, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Nov 20, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  16. Nov 20, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Feb 9, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  18. Feb 9, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  19. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  20. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  22. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  23. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  25. Feb 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-13-2026

  26. Mar 27, 2026 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-27-2026

  27. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  28. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote