Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 226

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: determination of where a defendant resides or does substantial business for purposes of venue.

Business Court — Procedure

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, with certain exceptions, venue in civil actions or special proceedings must be in either the county where the claim arose, the county where the real or tangible personal property, or some part thereof, which is the subject of the claim is situated, the county where a defendant resides or does substantial business, or, if none of the foregoing apply, in any county designated by the plaintiff. This bill provides that, for the purposes of determining whether a county is a proper venue based on where a defendant resides or does substantial business, a court may not consider the participation of a party joined to the civil action or special proceeding because their joinder is needed for just and complete adjudication, as provided under current law, or a party joined to the civil action or special proceeding whose joinder is permissive, as provided under current law. Further, this bill provides that, for the purposes of determining where a business entity resides or does substantial business, a business entity shall be deemed to reside in the place of incorporation or organization and shall be deemed to do substantial business only in the county of its principal place of business.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Feyen (R) , Marklein (R) , Quinn (R)

7 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Brooks (R) , Duchow (R) , Kreibich (R) , Maxey (R) , O'Connor (R) , Steffen (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 21

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Senate: Report passage without recommendation, pursuant to Senate Rule 27 (4)(a), by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 4

Failed 4–4 Sep 17, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 25, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Feyen, Marklein and Quinn; cosponsored by Representatives Duchow, Allen, Brooks, Kreibich, Maxey and O'Connor

  2. Apr 25, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. May 8, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Steffen added as a cosponsor

  4. Sep 3, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 17, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Sep 17, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage without recommendation, pursuant to Senate Rule 27 (4)(a), by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 4

  7. Sep 17, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1