Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 269

Delivery network couriers and transportation network drivers, Department of Financial Institutions’ approval to offer portable benefit accounts, providing for insurance coverage, modifying administrative rules related to accident and sickness insurance, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Topics: Administrative rules: Revisions, Employment, Financial Institutions, Department of, Insurance: Life and accident, Legislature: Tax Exemptions, Joint Survey Committee on, Transportation and delivery networks, Unemployment insurance, Wage: Minimum, Worker's compensation

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Aug 11, 2025. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 19, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 56 to 36

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 17 to 15

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Aug 11, 2025.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 256. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Delivery and transportation network companies General This bill provides that under specific circumstances, delivery network couriers and drivers for transportation network companies (application-based drivers) are not employees of the delivery network companies and transportation network companies (network companies) for the purposes of worker’s compensation insurance, minimum wage laws, and unemployment insurance. In the bill, “application-based driver” is defined as a delivery network courier or participating driver who provides services through the online-enabled application, software, website, or system of a network company.

Under the bill, if a network company does not engage in all of the following practices, an application-based driver is not an employee or agent of the company: 1) prescribe specific dates, times of day, or a minimum number of hours during which the driver must be logged into the network company’s online-enabled application, software, or system; 2) terminate the contract of the driver for not accepting a specific request for transportation or delivery service request; 3) restrict the driver from performing services through other network companies except while performing services through that network company; and 4) restrict the driver from working in any other lawful occupation or business. The bill provides that if this provision is held invalid by a court, the provisions regarding portable benefits accounts and group or blanket accident and sickness insurance coverage for application based drivers are invalid.

Read the full summary

Portable benefit accounts Under the bill, if certain conditions are satisfied, a financial services provider or other person may obtain approval from the Department of Financial Institutions to offer portable benefit accounts. A “portable benefit account” is an account administered by such an approved financial services provider or other person (portable benefit account provider) from which an individual may receive distributions for the purposes described below.

Under the bill, a network company may offer portable benefit accounts. If an application-based driver meets certain eligibility requirements (eligible driver), a network company may contribute an amount equal to 4 percent of that driver’s quarterly earnings to a portable benefit account, and the driver may also contribute to the portable benefit account. Contributions to a portable benefit account by the account owner may be subtracted from the owner’s income for state income tax purposes. Under the bill, an eligible driver may receive a distribution from a portable benefit account for the following purposes: 1) to compensate for lost income due to an illness or accident or loss of work due to the birth or adoption of the driver’s child; 2) to transfer the money to an individual retirement account (IRA); 3) to pay vision, dental, or health insurance premiums; and 4) to compensate for lost income through no fault of the driver from work for a network company. A network company must ensure that the portable benefit account provider it selects offers at least three options for IRA providers and an eligible driver may not transfer money from a portable benefit account to an IRA in an amount exceeding the contribution limits under federal law. A portable benefit account provider may include an income replacement benefit to be made available to eligible drivers. A financial services provider may not commingle assets in a portable benefit account with other property, except in a common trust fund or common investment fund.

Insurance coverage The bill provides that a network company may carry, provide, or otherwise make available group or blanket accident and sickness insurance for its application-based drivers. The bill requires a network company to make available, upon reasonable request, a copy of its group or blanket accident and sickness insurance policy. The bill specifies that the state’s worker’s compensation laws do not apply to such a policy.

The bill also provides that a network company may carry, provide, or otherwise make available group or blanket occupational accident insurance to cover the medical expenses and lost income resulting from an injury suffered by an application-based driver while engaged on the network company’s online-enabled application, software, or system. The bill requires a network company to make available, upon reasonable request, a copy of its blanket occupational accident insurance policy. The bill requires that the policy provide, in aggregate, at least $1,000,000 of coverage for the medical expenses, short-term disability, long-term disability, and survivor benefits. The coverage must include at least $250,000 for medical expenses; weekly disability payments equal to two-thirds of an application-based driver’s average weekly income, subject to certain restrictions, for up to 104 weeks following an injury; and survivor benefits in an amount equal to an application-based driver’s average weekly income, subject to certain restrictions, multiplied by 104. The bill provides that if a claim is covered by occupational accident insurance maintained by more than one network company, the insurer of the network company against whom a claim is filed is entitled to a contribution for the pro rata share of coverage attributable to one or more other network companies.

Under the bill, any benefit provided to an application-based driver under an occupational accident insurance policy is treated as amounts payable under a worker’s compensation law or disability benefit for the purpose of determining amounts payable under uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage.

Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.

Who's behind it

9 representatives are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on State Affairs vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 3 · Jun 6, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 56 to 36 · Jun 18, 2025 · 5 didn't vote

See how each of the 97 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (56)

No (36)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 17 to 15 · Jun 18, 2025 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Aug 11, 2025

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Aug 7, 2025

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 18, 2025

    The Senate passed it too, 17 to 15.

  5. Jun 18, 2025

    The Senate received it.

  6. Jun 18, 2025

    The Assembly passed it, 56 to 36.

  7. Jun 18, 2025

    “Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions received” (the official wording)

  8. Jun 17, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Jun 13, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  10. Jun 13, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions.

  11. Jun 6, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Jun 6, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 3.

  13. Jun 2, 2025

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  14. May 27, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. May 21, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  16. May 21, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. May 20, 2025

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  18. May 19, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.

  19. May 19, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Dallman, Brooks, Armstrong, Ortiz-Velez, Snyder, Wichgers, Wittke, Knodl and Prado; cosponsored by Senators Bradley, Cabral-Guevara and Testin

  2. May 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs

  3. May 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Senator Feyen added as a cosponsor

  4. May 21, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. May 21, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative Gustafson added as a coauthor

  6. May 27, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jun 2, 2025 · Assembly

    Senator James added as a cosponsor

  8. Jun 4, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Jun 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  10. Jun 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Jun 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (4)

  12. Jun 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Jun 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 6-18-2025

  14. Jun 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken by joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions

  15. Jun 17, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor

  16. Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions received

  17. Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 56, Noes 36, Paired 2

  21. Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  23. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended and taken up

  24. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  25. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  26. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  27. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 17, Noes 15

  28. Jun 18, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Jun 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  30. Jun 20, 2025 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 6-20-2025

  31. Jun 20, 2025 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  32. Aug 7, 2025 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 8-7-2025

  33. Aug 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-8-2025

  34. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  35. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote