Assembly Bill 269
Delivery network couriers and transportation network drivers, Department of Financial Institutions’ approval to offer portable benefit accounts, providing for insurance coverage, modifying administrative rules related to accident and sickness insurance, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Topics: Administrative rules: Revisions, Employment, Financial Institutions, Department of, Insurance: Life and accident, Legislature: Tax Exemptions, Joint Survey Committee on, Transportation and delivery networks, Unemployment insurance, Wage: Minimum, Worker's compensation
Vetoed by the governor
Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Aug 11, 2025. Lawmakers did not , so it stands.
-
Introduced, passed
May 19, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 56 to 36
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 17 to 15
-
Governor, stopped here
Vetoed Aug 11, 2025.
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 256. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Delivery and transportation network companies General This bill provides that under specific circumstances, delivery network couriers and drivers for transportation network companies (application-based drivers) are not employees of the delivery network companies and transportation network companies (network companies) for the purposes of worker’s compensation insurance, minimum wage laws, and unemployment insurance. In the bill, “application-based driver” is defined as a delivery network courier or participating driver who provides services through the online-enabled application, software, website, or system of a network company.
Under the bill, if a network company does not engage in all of the following practices, an application-based driver is not an employee or agent of the company: 1) prescribe specific dates, times of day, or a minimum number of hours during which the driver must be logged into the network company’s online-enabled application, software, or system; 2) terminate the contract of the driver for not accepting a specific request for transportation or delivery service request; 3) restrict the driver from performing services through other network companies except while performing services through that network company; and 4) restrict the driver from working in any other lawful occupation or business. The bill provides that if this provision is held invalid by a court, the provisions regarding portable benefits accounts and group or blanket accident and sickness insurance coverage for application based drivers are invalid.
Read the full summary Show less
Portable benefit accounts Under the bill, if certain conditions are satisfied, a financial services provider or other person may obtain approval from the Department of Financial Institutions to offer portable benefit accounts. A “portable benefit account” is an account administered by such an approved financial services provider or other person (portable benefit account provider) from which an individual may receive distributions for the purposes described below.
Under the bill, a network company may offer portable benefit accounts. If an application-based driver meets certain eligibility requirements (eligible driver), a network company may contribute an amount equal to 4 percent of that driver’s quarterly earnings to a portable benefit account, and the driver may also contribute to the portable benefit account. Contributions to a portable benefit account by the account owner may be subtracted from the owner’s income for state income tax purposes. Under the bill, an eligible driver may receive a distribution from a portable benefit account for the following purposes: 1) to compensate for lost income due to an illness or accident or loss of work due to the birth or adoption of the driver’s child; 2) to transfer the money to an individual retirement account (IRA); 3) to pay vision, dental, or health insurance premiums; and 4) to compensate for lost income through no fault of the driver from work for a network company. A network company must ensure that the portable benefit account provider it selects offers at least three options for IRA providers and an eligible driver may not transfer money from a portable benefit account to an IRA in an amount exceeding the contribution limits under federal law. A portable benefit account provider may include an income replacement benefit to be made available to eligible drivers. A financial services provider may not commingle assets in a portable benefit account with other property, except in a common trust fund or common investment fund.
Insurance coverage The bill provides that a network company may carry, provide, or otherwise make available group or blanket accident and sickness insurance for its application-based drivers. The bill requires a network company to make available, upon reasonable request, a copy of its group or blanket accident and sickness insurance policy. The bill specifies that the state’s worker’s compensation laws do not apply to such a policy.
The bill also provides that a network company may carry, provide, or otherwise make available group or blanket occupational accident insurance to cover the medical expenses and lost income resulting from an injury suffered by an application-based driver while engaged on the network company’s online-enabled application, software, or system. The bill requires a network company to make available, upon reasonable request, a copy of its blanket occupational accident insurance policy. The bill requires that the policy provide, in aggregate, at least $1,000,000 of coverage for the medical expenses, short-term disability, long-term disability, and survivor benefits. The coverage must include at least $250,000 for medical expenses; weekly disability payments equal to two-thirds of an application-based driver’s average weekly income, subject to certain restrictions, for up to 104 weeks following an injury; and survivor benefits in an amount equal to an application-based driver’s average weekly income, subject to certain restrictions, multiplied by 104. The bill provides that if a claim is covered by occupational accident insurance maintained by more than one network company, the insurer of the network company against whom a claim is filed is entitled to a contribution for the pro rata share of coverage attributable to one or more other network companies.
Under the bill, any benefit provided to an application-based driver under an occupational accident insurance policy is treated as amounts payable under a worker’s compensation law or disability benefit for the purpose of determining amounts payable under uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage.
Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.
Who's behind it
9 representatives are its . 7 are Republicans and 2 are Democrats.
7 more lawmakers .
See all 16 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Alex Dallman · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Democrat, Assembly
- Priscilla Prado · Democrat, Assembly
- Pat Snyder · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Wittke · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (7)
- Julian Bradley · Republican, Senate
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Gus Gustafson · Republican, Assembly
- Jesse James · Republican, Senate
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Patrick Testin · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on State Affairs vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 3 · Jun 6, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 56 to 36 · Jun 18, 2025 · 5 didn't vote
See how each of the 97 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (56)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Ben Franklin (R, 88)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Brent Jacobson (R, 87)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Duke Tucker (R, 75)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Piwowarczyk (R, 98)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Lindee Brill (R, 27)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Melotik (R, 22)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Kreibich (R, 28)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Russell Goodwin (D, 12)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
No (36)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Amaad Rivera-Wagner (D, 90)
- Andrew Hysell (D, 48)
- Angela Stroud (D, 73)
- Angelina Cruz (D, 62)
- Angelito Tenorio (D, 14)
- Ann Roe (D, 44)
- Ben DeSmidt (D, 65)
- Brienne Brown (D, 43)
- Christian Phelps (D, 93)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Joan Fitzgerald (D, 46)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joe Sheehan (D, 26)
- Karen DeSanto (D, 40)
- Karen Kirsch (D, 7)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Maureen McCarville (D, 42)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Randy Udell (D, 47)
- Renuka Mayadev (D, 77)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
- Ryan Spaude (D, 89)
- Sequanna Taylor (D, 11)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Tara Johnson (D, 96)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Vinnie Miresse (D, 71)
Didn't vote (5)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Priscilla Prado (D, 9)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 17 to 15 · Jun 18, 2025 · 1 didn't vote
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (17)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Cory Tomczyk (R, 29)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (15)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- Jamie Wall (D, 30)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jodi Habush Sinykin (D, 8)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Kristin Dassler-Alfheim (D, 18)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Melissa Ratcliff (D, 16)
- Sarah Keyeski (D, 14)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Didn't vote (1)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
May 13, 2026
The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.
-
Aug 11, 2025
The governor vetoed it.
-
Aug 7, 2025
Sent to the governor.
-
Jun 18, 2025
The Senate passed it too, 17 to 15.
-
Jun 18, 2025
The Senate received it.
-
Jun 18, 2025
The Assembly passed it, 56 to 36.
-
Jun 18, 2025
“Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions received” (the official wording)
-
Jun 17, 2025
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Jun 13, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jun 13, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions.
-
Jun 6, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jun 6, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 3.
-
Jun 2, 2025
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
May 27, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 21, 2025
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
May 21, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 20, 2025
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
May 19, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.
-
May 19, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- May 19, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Dallman, Brooks, Armstrong, Ortiz-Velez, Snyder, Wichgers, Wittke, Knodl and Prado; cosponsored by Senators Bradley, Cabral-Guevara and Testin
- May 19, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on State Affairs
- May 20, 2025 · Assembly
Senator Feyen added as a cosponsor
- May 21, 2025 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 21, 2025 · Assembly
Representative Gustafson added as a coauthor
- May 27, 2025 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jun 2, 2025 · Assembly
Senator James added as a cosponsor
- Jun 4, 2025 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 6, 2025 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on State Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 3
- Jun 6, 2025 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 13, 2025 · Assembly
Referred to joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (4)
- Jun 13, 2025 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 16, 2025 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Rules and referred to calendar of 6-18-2025
- Jun 17, 2025 · Assembly
Executive action taken by joint survey committee on Tax Exemptions
- Jun 17, 2025 · Assembly
Representative O'Connor added as a coauthor
- Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly
Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions received
- Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 56, Noes 36, Paired 2
- Jun 18, 2025 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 18, 2025 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jun 18, 2025 · Senate
Rules suspended and taken up
- Jun 18, 2025 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jun 18, 2025 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 18, 2025 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Jun 18, 2025 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 17, Noes 15
- Jun 18, 2025 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 19, 2025 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Jun 20, 2025 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled on 6-20-2025
- Jun 20, 2025 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Aug 7, 2025 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 8-7-2025
- Aug 11, 2025 · Assembly
Report vetoed by the Governor on 8-8-2025
- May 12, 2026 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
- May 13, 2026 · Assembly
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
Terms on this page
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Veto override
Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote