Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session
Relating to: discrimination based on arrest record under the fair employment law.
Criminal identification and investigation Discrimination in employment Disease
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill changes the circumstances under which an employer or licensing agency may consider pending charges against an individual under the fair employment law when making employment or licensing determinations.
Under the current fair employment law, it is generally an unlawful act of employment discrimination for an employer or a licensing agency to refuse to hire, employ, admit, or license any individual; to bar or terminate an individual from employment; or to discriminate against any individual in promotion, in compensation, or in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or labor organization membership because of the individual’s arrest record. “Arrest record” is generally defined as information indicating that an individual has been questioned, apprehended, taken into custody or detention, held for investigation, arrested, charged with, indicted, or tried for any felony, misdemeanor, or other offense. In
Oconomowoc Area School District v. Cota
, 2025 WI 11, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the phrase “other offense” encompasses noncriminal offenses and that, therefore, the prohibition against arrest record discrimination extends to pending charges other than criminal charges. However, under certain exceptions to the foregoing prohibition, it is not employment discrimination because of arrest record to refuse to employ or license, or to suspend from employment or licensing, an individual because the individual is subject to a pending charge if the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job or the licensed activity.
The bill eliminates the requirement, in the exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination, that the pending charge be a
criminal
charge.
Sponsors
Registered lobbying interests · 3
Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Jobs and Economy, Ayes 7, Noes 3
Passed 7–3 Feb 4, 2026 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Duchow, Behnke, Green, Kitchens, Knodl, Murphy, Penterman, Piwowarczyk and Stubbs; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard and Nass
- Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Jobs and Economy
- Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Goodwin added as a coauthor
- Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Jobs and Economy, Ayes 7, Noes 3
- Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Goodwin withdrawn as a coauthor
- Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Stubbs withdrawn as a coauthor
- Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:20 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1