Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 430

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: discrimination based on arrest record under the fair employment law.

Criminal identification and investigation Discrimination in employment Disease

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill changes the circumstances under which an employer or licensing agency may consider pending charges against an individual under the fair employment law when making employment or licensing determinations.

Under the current fair employment law, it is generally an unlawful act of employment discrimination for an employer or a licensing agency to refuse to hire, employ, admit, or license any individual; to bar or terminate an individual from employment; or to discriminate against any individual in promotion, in compensation, or in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or labor organization membership because of the individual’s arrest record. “Arrest record” is generally defined as information indicating that an individual has been questioned, apprehended, taken into custody or detention, held for investigation, arrested, charged with, indicted, or tried for any felony, misdemeanor, or other offense. In

Oconomowoc Area School District v. Cota

, 2025 WI 11, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the phrase “other offense” encompasses noncriminal offenses and that, therefore, the prohibition against arrest record discrimination extends to pending charges other than criminal charges. However, under certain exceptions to the foregoing prohibition, it is not employment discrimination because of arrest record to refuse to employ or license, or to suspend from employment or licensing, an individual because the individual is subject to a pending charge if the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job or the licensed activity.

The bill eliminates the requirement, in the exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination, that the pending charge be a

criminal

charge.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Behnke (R) , Duchow (R) , Green (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Murphy (R) , Penterman (R) , Piwowarczyk (R)

2 cosponsors

Nass (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 3

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Jobs and Economy, Ayes 7, Noes 3

Passed 7–3 Feb 4, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Duchow, Behnke, Green, Kitchens, Knodl, Murphy, Penterman, Piwowarczyk and Stubbs; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard and Nass

  2. Sep 15, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Jobs and Economy

  3. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 30, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Goodwin added as a coauthor

  5. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Jobs and Economy, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  7. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Goodwin withdrawn as a coauthor

  9. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Stubbs withdrawn as a coauthor

  10. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:20 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  11. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  12. Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1