Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 431

Vetoed Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: discrimination based on arrest record under the fair employment law.

Criminal identification and investigation Discrimination in employment Disease

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, stopped here
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill changes the circumstances under which an employer or licensing agency may consider pending charges against an individual under the fair employment law when making employment or licensing determinations.

Under the current fair employment law, it is generally an unlawful act of employment discrimination for an employer or a licensing agency to refuse to hire, employ, admit, or license any individual; to bar or terminate an individual from employment; or to discriminate against any individual in promotion, in compensation, or in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or labor organization membership because of the individual’s arrest record. “Arrest record” is generally defined as information indicating that an individual has been questioned, apprehended, taken into custody or detention, held for investigation, arrested, charged with, indicted, or tried for any felony, misdemeanor, or other offense. In

Oconomowoc Area School District v. Cota

, 2025 WI 11, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the phrase “other offense” encompasses noncriminal offenses and that, therefore, the prohibition against arrest record discrimination extends to pending charges other than criminal charges. However, under certain exceptions to the foregoing prohibition, it is not employment discrimination because of arrest record to refuse to employ or license, or to suspend from employment or licensing, an individual because the individual is subject to a pending charge if the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular job or the licensed activity.

The bill eliminates the requirement, in the exceptions to the prohibition on arrest record discrimination, that the pending charge be a

criminal

charge.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Nass (R) , Wanggaard (R)

8 cosponsors

Behnke (R) , Duchow (R) , Green (R) , Kitchens (R) , Knodl (R) , Murphy (R) , Penterman (R) , Piwowarczyk (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 3

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Jan 16, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: CONCURRENCE

Passed 54–41 Feb 19, 2026 official source full page

Aye · 54

Nay · 41

Not voting · 4

Full history

  1. Sep 29, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wanggaard and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Duchow, Behnke, Green, Kitchens, Knodl, Murphy, Penterman, Piwowarczyk and Stubbs

  2. Sep 29, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development

  3. Jan 7, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  6. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Feb 9, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-11-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. Feb 10, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Stubbs withdrawn as a cosponsor

  9. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  10. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  11. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  15. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  16. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:20 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  17. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  18. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 54, Noes 41

  21. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. Feb 23, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  23. Feb 24, 2026 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  24. Mar 26, 2026 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2026

  25. Mar 27, 2026 · Senate

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-27-2026

  26. May 12, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  27. May 13, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82