Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 673

Banning the use of genetic software from foreign adversaries in medical and research facilities, the storage of any human genome sequencing data within the borders of a foreign adversary, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Topics: Attorney General, Data processing, Forfeiture, Genetics and genetic testing, Hospitals and health care facilities, International relations, Medical education

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Mar 27, 2026. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 19, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 22, 2026

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 20 to 13

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Mar 27, 2026.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 13, 2026: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

Read the governor's veto message · All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 649. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill prohibits any medical facility or research facility in this state from using a genetic sequencer used for genetic analysis or operational or research software used for genetic analysis that is produced in or by a foreign adversary, a company organized within the borders of a country that is a foreign adversary, or an owned or controlled subsidiary or affiliate of a company domiciled within the borders of a country that is a foreign adversary. Under the bill, “foreign adversary” means a person determined by the U.S. Department of Commerce to be a foreign adversary of the United States. Those countries currently include China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela under the regime of Nicolás Maduro. The bill provides that “operational or research software” means computer programs used for the operation, control, analysis, or other necessary functions of genetic analysis or genetic sequencers. Under the bill, a “genetic sequencer” is any device or platform used to conduct genetic analysis, resequencing, isolation, or other genetic research.

The bill provides that a “medical facility” is a facility for the delivery of health services that receives state moneys, including interagency pass-through appropriations from the federal government, and conducts research or testing on or relating to genetic analysis or the human genome. Similarly, under the bill, a “research facility” is a facility that receives state moneys, including interagency pass-through appropriations from the federal government, and conducts research on or relating to genetic analysis or the human genome.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, no medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization may store any human genome sequencing data of a resident of this state at a location within the borders of a foreign adversary, and each medical facility, research facility, company, or nonprofit organization must ensure that such data is inaccessible to any person located within the borders of a foreign adversary. The bill provides that these requirements do not apply to the storage of human genome sequencing data that is collected as part of clinical trials or other biomedical research studies subject to, or conducted in accordance with, certain federal regulations relating to protection of sensitive personal and government-related data.

The bill provides for enforcement by the attorney general and allows the attorney general to investigate allegations of a violation. Any person may notify the attorney general of a violation or potential violation. Under the bill, a person must forfeit $10,000 for each violation of genetic sequencing with a prohibited device or prohibited storage of human genome sequencing data. The attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state to collect any forfeiture imposed for a violation.

Who's behind it

13 representatives are its ⁠. All 13 are Republicans.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (13)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 5 · Jan 16, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 53 to 44 · Jan 22, 2026 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (53)

No (44)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “SHALL THE DECISION OF THE CHAIR STAND”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 53 to 44 · Jan 22, 2026 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (53)

No (44)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Licensing vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 4, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 17, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 13 · Feb 18, 2026

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 13, 2026

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Mar 27, 2026

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Mar 26, 2026

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 18, 2026

    The Senate passed it too, 20 to 13.

  5. Feb 17, 2026

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Feb 4, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  7. Jan 26, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs.

  8. Jan 22, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  9. Jan 22, 2026

    The Assembly passed it, 53 to 44.

  10. Jan 22, 2026

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Jan 22, 2026

    “Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken” (the official wording)

  12. Jan 16, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  13. Jan 16, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 5.

  14. Jan 6, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Dec 16, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Dec 2, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Nov 19, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

  18. Nov 19, 2025

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Moses, Dallman, Callahan, Kreibich, Kurtz, Piwowarczyk, Mursau, Neylon, Dittrich, Knodl, Green, Behnke and Brill; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Tomczyk, Jacque and Nass

  2. Nov 19, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Dec 2, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 16, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 6, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  8. Jan 16, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Jan 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-22-2026 by Committee on Rules

  10. Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Moses

  11. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  12. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative McGuire

  13. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  14. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  15. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  16. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  17. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  20. Jan 22, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Jan 22, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Jan 26, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

  23. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  24. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  25. Feb 4, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  26. Feb 17, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  27. Feb 17, 2026 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-18-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  28. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give bill its third reading

  31. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 13

  32. Feb 18, 2026 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  34. Feb 20, 2026 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-20-2026

  35. Mar 26, 2026 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2026

  36. Mar 27, 2026 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 3-27-2026

  37. May 12, 2026 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  38. May 13, 2026 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote