Assembly Bill 799
A health professional assistance program and making an appropriation. (FE)
Topics: Medical service: Occupations, Physician, Safety and Professional Services, Department of
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 23, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 802. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill directs the Department of Safety and Professional Services to contract with an entity to establish and operate a health professional assistance program to coordinate detection, evaluation, treatment, and continuing care monitoring for health care providers who are suffering from a condition that could lead to impairment, which the bill defines as the inability of a health care provider to practice with reasonable skill or safety due to a health condition.
Under the bill, the entity selected by DSPS to provide the program must be sponsored by a health care provider professional association or society, be organized as a not-for-profit entity, contract with or employ a medical director who specializes or has training or expertise in addiction medicine, and contract with or employ health care providers as needed for the program’s operation. In addition, the program must adopt certain procedures, including procedures for 1) determining eligibility for the program; 2) contracting or coordinating with a network of health care providers to provide care for participants; 3) monitoring the continuing care and support of participants; 4) intervening when participants violate any terms of program participation or when participants may require additional evaluation or treatment; and 5) safeguarding confidentiality.
Read the full summary Show less
The bill allows a credentialing board that regulates health care providers to participate in the program with respect to one or more credentials issued by that board. If a credentialing board participates in the program, the credentialing board is not required to participate in the program with respect to each credential issued by the board, but may limit its participation to one or more specified credentials.
The bill provides that the program must allow health care providers who are suffering from a condition that could lead to impairment to participate on a voluntary and confidential basis. The bill provides that voluntary participation in the program does not limit a credentialing board’s authority to investigate or discipline the participating health care provider on the basis of conduct that is unrelated to the health care provider’s participation in the program.
The bill permits health care providers and credentialing boards that have reason to believe that a health care provider has a condition that could lead to impairment to report the health care provider to the program. The bill requires the program to receive and assess the reports and determine whether the health care provider who is the subject of the report requires further screening, evaluation, treatment, or other action. If the program determines that a health care provider requires further screening, evaluation, treatment, or other action, the program must offer the health care provider the option to voluntarily participate in the program.
Under current law, a physician who has reason to believe that certain facts about another physician are true, including that the other physician is engaging or has engaged in acts that constitute a pattern of unprofessional conduct or that the other physician is or may be medically incompetent, must promptly submit a written report to the Medical Examining Board that includes facts relating to the conduct of the other physician. The bill provides that a physician can fulfill their reporting obligation by submitting a written report to the program, instead of the Medical Examining Board, if the Medical Examining Board is participating in the program with respect to physician credentials.
The bill provides that a health care provider’s participation in the program, any treatment received through the program, and any information reported to the program shall remain confidential except as provided in the bill; that the program may disclose information about a health care provider to a credentialing board only in certain circumstances; and that no person may require that a health care provider disclose their participation in the program or any treatment received through the program. The bill further provides that information, interviews, reports, statements, memoranda, and other documents that are furnished to the program or produced by the program are privileged and confidential.
The bill provides immunity from civil liability as specified in the bill for the program and its employees, officers, and agents and reporting health care providers.
Finally, the bill directs DSPS to charge a fee of $70 to each health care provider whose credential is served by the program to be paid at the time the health care provider is issued or renews their credential. The bill provides funding for the program costs using moneys collected from those fees.
Who's behind it
10 representatives are its . 6 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.
13 more lawmakers .
See all 23 names Hide the names
Authors (10)
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Steve Doyle · Democrat, Assembly
- Tara Johnson · Democrat, Assembly
- Tony Kurtz · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Democrat, Assembly
- Ryan Spaude · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Robyn Vining · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (13)
- Jill Billings · Democrat, Assembly
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Angelina Cruz · Democrat, Assembly
- Bob Donovan · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Jesse James · Republican, Senate
- Alex Joers · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Larson · Democrat, Senate
- Maureen McCarville · Democrat, Assembly
- Brad Pfaff · Democrat, Senate
- Shelia Stubbs · Democrat, Assembly
- Udell and Stroud
- Van Wanggaard · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it
Passed, 15 to 0 · Jan 21, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 20, 2026
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 27, 2026
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 27, 2026 to Feb 24, 2026
2 more representatives and 2 senators signed on in support.
-
Jan 21, 2026
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 21, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.
-
Jan 14, 2026 to Jan 16, 2026
2 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Jan 14, 2026
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 2, 2026 to Jan 5, 2026
3 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Dec 23, 2025
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care.
-
Dec 23, 2025
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 23, 2025 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Dittrich, Kurtz, Doyle, Johnson, Ortiz-Velez, Spaude, Subeck, Vining and O'Connor; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, James, Wanggaard and Cabral-Guevara
- Dec 23, 2025 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care
- Jan 2, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Billings added as a coauthor
- Jan 5, 2026 · Assembly
- Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 14, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Stubbs added as a coauthor
- Jan 16, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Donovan added as a coauthor
- Jan 20, 2026 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Jan 21, 2026 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 27, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Joers added as a coauthor
- Feb 3, 2026 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Brooks
- Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly
Representative McCarville added as a coauthor
- Feb 23, 2026 · Assembly
Senator Pfaff added as a cosponsor
- Feb 24, 2026 · Assembly
Senator Larson added as a cosponsor
- Feb 27, 2026 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 20, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Cruz added as a coauthor
- Mar 23, 2026 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote