Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 802

A health professional assistance program and making an appropriation. (FE)

Topics: Medical service: Occupations, Physician, Safety and Professional Services, Department of

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 2, 2026

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 799. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill directs the Department of Safety and Professional Services to contract with an entity to establish and operate a health professional assistance program to coordinate detection, evaluation, treatment, and continuing care monitoring for health care providers who are suffering from a condition that could lead to impairment, which the bill defines as the inability of a health care provider to practice with reasonable skill or safety due to a health condition.

Under the bill, the entity selected by DSPS to provide the program must be sponsored by a health care provider professional association or society, be organized as a not-for-profit entity, contract with or employ a medical director who specializes or has training or expertise in addiction medicine, and contract with or employ health care providers as needed for the program’s operation. In addition, the program must adopt certain procedures, including procedures for 1) determining eligibility for the program; 2) contracting or coordinating with a network of health care providers to provide care for participants; 3) monitoring the continuing care and support of participants; 4) intervening when participants violate any terms of program participation or when participants may require additional evaluation or treatment; and 5) safeguarding confidentiality.

Read the full summary

The bill allows a credentialing board that regulates health care providers to participate in the program with respect to one or more credentials issued by that board. If a credentialing board participates in the program, the credentialing board is not required to participate in the program with respect to each credential issued by the board, but may limit its participation to one or more specified credentials.

The bill provides that the program must allow health care providers who are suffering from a condition that could lead to impairment to participate on a voluntary and confidential basis. The bill provides that voluntary participation in the program does not limit a credentialing board’s authority to investigate or discipline the participating health care provider on the basis of conduct that is unrelated to the health care provider’s participation in the program.

The bill permits health care providers and credentialing boards that have reason to believe that a health care provider has a condition that could lead to impairment to report the health care provider to the program. The bill requires the program to receive and assess the reports and determine whether the health care provider who is the subject of the report requires further screening, evaluation, treatment, or other action. If the program determines that a health care provider requires further screening, evaluation, treatment, or other action, the program must offer the health care provider the option to voluntarily participate in the program.

Under current law, a physician who has reason to believe that certain facts about another physician are true, including that the other physician is engaging or has engaged in acts that constitute a pattern of unprofessional conduct or that the other physician is or may be medically incompetent, must promptly submit a written report to the Medical Examining Board that includes facts relating to the conduct of the other physician. The bill provides that a physician can fulfill their reporting obligation by submitting a written report to the program, instead of the Medical Examining Board, if the Medical Examining Board is participating in the program with respect to physician credentials.

The bill provides that a health care provider’s participation in the program, any treatment received through the program, and any information reported to the program shall remain confidential except as provided in the bill; that the program may disclose information about a health care provider to a credentialing board only in certain circumstances; and that no person may require that a health care provider disclose their participation in the program or any treatment received through the program. The bill further provides that information, interviews, reports, statements, memoranda, and other documents that are furnished to the program or produced by the program are privileged and confidential.

The bill provides immunity from civil liability as specified in the bill for the program and its employees, officers, and agents and reporting health care providers.

Finally, the bill directs DSPS to charge a fee of $70 to each health care provider whose credential is served by the program to be paid at the time the health care provider is issued or renews their credential. The bill provides funding for the program costs using moneys collected from those fees.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. All 4 are Republicans.

20 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 24 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (20)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Mental Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 3, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 23, 2026 to Feb 24, 2026

    2 more senators signed on in support.

  3. Feb 19, 2026

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Feb 11, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Feb 3, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  6. Jan 27, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  7. Jan 27, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Jan 5, 2026 to Jan 16, 2026

    5 more representatives signed on in support.

  9. Jan 2, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families.

  10. Jan 2, 2026

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 2, 2026 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Feyen, James, Wanggaard and Cabral-Guevara; cosponsored by Representatives Brooks, Dittrich, Doyle, Johnson, Kurtz, Ortiz-Velez, Spaude, Subeck, Vining, O'Connor and Billings

  2. Jan 2, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families

  3. Jan 5, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Udell added as a cosponsor

  4. Jan 6, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Stroud added as a cosponsor

  5. Jan 7, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor

  6. Jan 15, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Stubbs added as a cosponsor

  7. Jan 16, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Donovan added as a cosponsor

  8. Jan 20, 2026 · Senate

    LRB correction

  9. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  10. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Joers added as a cosponsor

  11. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Mental Health, Substance Abuse Prevention, Children and Families, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Feb 3, 2026 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen

  15. Feb 11, 2026 · Senate

    Representative McCarville added as a cosponsor

  16. Feb 19, 2026 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  17. Feb 23, 2026 · Senate

    Senator Pfaff added as a coauthor

  18. Feb 24, 2026 · Senate

    Senator Larson added as a coauthor

  19. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote