Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Assembly Bill 892

Digital asset staking and the state’s securities laws

Topics: Data processing, Financial institution, Securities: Regulation

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 19, 2026, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 23, 2026

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 19, 2026

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 885. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may not offer or sell any security in this state unless the security is registered with the Department of Financial Institutions, the security or transaction is exempt from registration, or the security is a federal covered security.

This bill specifies that digital asset staking and “staking as a service” are not securities under the state’s securities laws. The bill defines a “digital asset” as any digital representation of value that is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or other similar technology, including cryptocurrency. The bill defines “staking” as the act of committing or locking a digital asset to support the security and operations of a blockchain protocol that uses a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism by either operating a validator node or delegating the digital asset to a validator. The bill defines “staking as a service” as the provision of technical solutions by a third-party service provider to token owners to enable their participation in staking.

Who's behind it

6 representatives are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Authors (6)

Signed on in support (2)

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Science vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 11, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Utilities vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 13, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 13, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  3. Feb 27, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism.

  4. Feb 23, 2026

    The Senate received it.

  5. Feb 19, 2026

    The Assembly passed it.

  6. Feb 11, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Feb 11, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  8. Feb 10, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  9. Feb 4, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Jan 23, 2026

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Science, Technology, and AI.

  11. Jan 23, 2026

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Neylon, Gustafson, Tranel, Tusler, Wittke and Knodl; cosponsored by Senator Cabral-Guevara

  2. Jan 23, 2026 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Science, Technology, and AI

  3. Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a coauthor

  5. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:42 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14

  9. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 23, 2026 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Feb 27, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism

  16. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  18. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote