Assembly Bill 892
Digital asset staking and the state’s securities laws
Topics: Data processing, Financial institution, Securities: Regulation
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Feb 19, 2026, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 23, 2026
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 19, 2026
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Senate as SB 885. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a person may not offer or sell any security in this state unless the security is registered with the Department of Financial Institutions, the security or transaction is exempt from registration, or the security is a federal covered security.
This bill specifies that digital asset staking and “staking as a service” are not securities under the state’s securities laws. The bill defines a “digital asset” as any digital representation of value that is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or other similar technology, including cryptocurrency. The bill defines “staking” as the act of committing or locking a digital asset to support the security and operations of a blockchain protocol that uses a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism by either operating a validator node or delegating the digital asset to a validator. The bill defines “staking as a service” as the provision of technical solutions by a third-party service provider to token owners to enable their participation in staking.
Who's behind it
6 representatives are its . All 6 are Republicans.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 8 names Hide the names
Authors (6)
- Gus Gustafson · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Adam Neylon · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Wittke · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Democrat, Assembly
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Science vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 11, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Utilities vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 13, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 13, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Feb 27, 2026
Sent to the Senate Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism.
-
Feb 23, 2026
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 19, 2026
The Assembly passed it.
-
Feb 11, 2026
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 11, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Feb 10, 2026
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Feb 4, 2026
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 23, 2026
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Science, Technology, and AI.
-
Jan 23, 2026
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 23, 2026 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Neylon, Gustafson, Tranel, Tusler, Wittke and Knodl; cosponsored by Senator Cabral-Guevara
- Jan 23, 2026 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Science, Technology, and AI
- Feb 4, 2026 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 10, 2026 · Assembly
Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a coauthor
- Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Science, Technology, and AI, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Feb 11, 2026 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:42 AM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2026 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 27, 2026 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism
- Mar 13, 2026 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 13, 2026 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Mar 13, 2026 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2026 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote