Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 885

Digital asset staking and the state’s securities laws

Topics: Data processing, Financial institution, Securities: Regulation

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 27, 2026

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 892. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may not offer or sell any security in this state unless the security is registered with the Department of Financial Institutions, the security or transaction is exempt from registration, or the security is a federal covered security.

This bill specifies that digital asset staking and “staking as a service” are not securities under the state’s securities laws. The bill defines a “digital asset” as any digital representation of value that is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or other similar technology, including cryptocurrency. The bill defines “staking” as the act of committing or locking a digital asset to support the security and operations of a blockchain protocol that uses a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism by either operating a validator node or delegating the digital asset to a validator. The bill defines “staking as a service” as the provision of technical solutions by a third-party service provider to token owners to enable their participation in staking.

Who's behind it

Rachael Cabral-Guevara, a Republican, is its ⁠.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 8 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (7)

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Senate Committee on Utilities vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 13, 2026

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 13, 2026

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  3. Feb 25, 2026

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Feb 10, 2026

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Jan 27, 2026

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism.

  6. Jan 27, 2026

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Cabral-Guevara; cosponsored by Representatives Neylon, Gustafson, Knodl, Tranel, Tusler and Wittke

  2. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism

  3. Feb 10, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 25, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote