Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 885

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: digital asset staking and the state’s securities laws.

Data processing Financial institution Securities — Regulation

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a person may not offer or sell any security in this state unless the security is registered with the Department of Financial Institutions, the security or transaction is exempt from registration, or the security is a federal covered security.

This bill specifies that digital asset staking and “staking as a service” are not securities under the state’s securities laws. The bill defines a “digital asset” as any digital representation of value that is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or other similar technology, including cryptocurrency. The bill defines “staking” as the act of committing or locking a digital asset to support the security and operations of a blockchain protocol that uses a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism by either operating a validator node or delegating the digital asset to a validator. The bill defines “staking as a service” as the provision of technical solutions by a third-party service provider to token owners to enable their participation in staking.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cabral-Guevara (R)

7 cosponsors

Gustafson (R) , Knodl (R) , Neylon (R) , Ortiz-Velez (D) , Tranel (R) , Tusler (R) , Wittke (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 2

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2

Passed 3–2 Mar 13, 2026 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Cabral-Guevara; cosponsored by Representatives Neylon, Gustafson, Knodl, Tranel, Tusler and Wittke

  2. Jan 27, 2026 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism

  3. Feb 10, 2026 · Senate

    Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 25, 2026 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  7. Mar 13, 2026 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1