Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

AB 91

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the requirement that first class cities and first class city school districts place school resource officers in schools. (FE)

Administration department of — Budget and fiscal issues Milwaukee — City Milwaukee — School Police Public instruction department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law requires, beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of a first class city school district (currently only Milwaukee Public Schools) to ensure that at least 25 school resource officers are present at schools within the school district (SRO requirement). Under current law, a “school resource officer” is a law enforcement officer who is deployed in community-oriented policing and assigned by the law enforcement agency that employs him or her to work in a full-time capacity in collaboration with a school district. Current law also requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to agree on how to apportion the costs of meeting the SRO requirement between the two entities.

On October 8, 2024, a complaint was filed in Milwaukee County that alleged MPS is failing to comply with the SRO requirement and asked for a writ of mandamus to require compliance. On January 23, 2025, a Milwaukee County judge ordered MPS to comply with the SRO requirement on or before February 17, 2025. On February 17, 2025, the same Milwaukee County judge gave MPS an additional 10 days to comply with the January 23, 2025 order.

This bill requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to apportion 75 percent of the costs of complying with the SRO requirement to MPS and 25 percent to the City of Milwaukee. The bill further requires that by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law 1) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement and 2) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must jointly certify to the Joint Committee on Finance that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.

Under the bill, a similar certification process is required if the initial agreement between MPS and the City of Milwaukee is terminated. First, MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement within 30 days of the termination of the agreement. Second, by no later than 30 days after entering into the agreement, the City of Milwaukee must certify to JCF that at least 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools. Lastly, by no later than 30 days after the certification is made to JCF, MPS must certify to JCF that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.

The bill also creates financial consequences for both the City of Milwaukee and MPS if these requirements are not met. Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Administration to withhold 10 percent of the supplemental county and municipal aid to the City of Milwaukee if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the city and MPS or if the City of Milwaukee fails to certify to JCF, by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools and, if a new agreement is entered into in the future, that 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools. Similarly, the bill requires the Department of Public Instruction to withhold 20 percent of the per pupil categorical aid payment owed to MPS if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the City of Milwaukee and MPS or if MPS fails to certify to JCF by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law and, if required in the future due to a new agreement, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Behnke (R) , Brill (R) , Dittrich (R) , Donovan (R) , Gundrum (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kurtz (R) , Maxey (R) , Murphy (R) , Novak (R) , O'Connor (R) , Tusler (R) , Wittke (R)

5 cosponsors

Carpenter (D) , Feyen (R) , Kitchens (R) , Tomczyk (R) , Wanggaard (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 5

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 2

Passed 13–2 Mar 11, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 10, Noes 5

Passed 10–5 Mar 11, 2025 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: SHALL THE DECISION OF THE CHAIR STAND

Passed 53–44 Mar 13, 2025 official source full page

Aye · 53

Nay · 44

Not voting · 2

Assembly: PASSAGE

Passed 53–44 Mar 13, 2025 official source full page

Aye · 53

Nay · 44

Not voting · 2

Full history

  1. Feb 28, 2025 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Donovan, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kurtz, Maxey, Murphy, Novak, O'Connor, Tusler, Wittke and Kaufert; cosponsored by Senators Wanggaard, Feyen and Tomczyk

  2. Feb 28, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Mar 5, 2025 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 5, 2025 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 6, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Donovan

  6. Mar 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 2

  8. Mar 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  9. Mar 11, 2025 · Assembly

    Referred to calendar of 3-13-2025 pursuant to Assembly Rule 45 (1)

  10. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Sinicki

  11. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  12. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  13. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  14. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  15. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  18. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Mar 13, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Mar 13, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Mar 14, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  22. Mar 17, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Kitchens added as a coauthor

  23. Mar 17, 2026 · Senate

    Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  24. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1