Skip to content

Bills · 2025-2026 Regular Session

SB 100

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the requirement that first class cities and first class city school districts place school resource officers in schools. (FE)

Administration department of — Budget and fiscal issues Milwaukee — City Milwaukee — School Police Public instruction department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Current law requires, beginning January 1, 2024, the school board of a first class city school district (currently only Milwaukee Public Schools) to ensure that at least 25 school resource officers are present at schools within the school district (SRO requirement). Under current law, a “school resource officer” is a law enforcement officer who is deployed in community-oriented policing and assigned by the law enforcement agency that employs him or her to work in a full-time capacity in collaboration with a school district. Current law also requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to agree on how to apportion the costs of meeting the SRO requirement between the two entities.

On October 8, 2024, a complaint was filed in Milwaukee County that alleged MPS is failing to comply with the SRO requirement and asked for a writ of mandamus to require compliance. On January 23, 2025, a Milwaukee County judge ordered MPS to comply with the SRO requirement on or before February 17, 2025. On February 17, 2025, the same Milwaukee County judge gave MPS an additional 10 days to comply with the January 23, 2025 order.

This bill requires MPS and the City of Milwaukee to apportion 75 percent of the costs of complying with the SRO requirement to MPS and 25 percent to the City of Milwaukee. The bill further requires that by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law 1) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement and 2) MPS and the City of Milwaukee must jointly certify to the Joint Committee on Finance that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.

Under the bill, a similar certification process is required if the initial agreement between MPS and the City of Milwaukee is terminated. First, MPS and the City of Milwaukee must enter into an agreement on how they will implement compliance with the SRO requirement within 30 days of the termination of the agreement. Second, by no later than 30 days after entering into the agreement, the City of Milwaukee must certify to JCF that at least 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools. Lastly, by no later than 30 days after the certification is made to JCF, MPS must certify to JCF that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.

The bill also creates financial consequences for both the City of Milwaukee and MPS if these requirements are not met. Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Administration to withhold 10 percent of the supplemental county and municipal aid to the City of Milwaukee if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the city and MPS or if the City of Milwaukee fails to certify to JCF, by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools and, if a new agreement is entered into in the future, that 25 law enforcement officers are trained and available to be placed in MPS schools. Similarly, the bill requires the Department of Public Instruction to withhold 20 percent of the per pupil categorical aid payment owed to MPS if evidence is not provided of an agreement between the City of Milwaukee and MPS or if MPS fails to certify to JCF by no later than 30 days after the bill becomes law and, if required in the future due to a new agreement, that at least 25 school resource officers are present in MPS schools.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Feyen (R) , Tomczyk (R) , Wanggaard (R)

14 cosponsors

Behnke (R) , Brill (R) , Dittrich (R) , Donovan (R) , Gundrum (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kitchens (R) , Kurtz (R) , Maxey (R) , Murphy (R) , Novak (R) , O'Connor (R) , Tusler (R) , Wittke (R)

Registered lobbying interests · 2

Organizations that registered lobbying activity on this bill with the Wisconsin Ethics Commission. Registration means interest, not a position for or against. Official record

Full history

  1. Mar 7, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Feyen and Tomczyk; cosponsored by Representatives Donovan, Behnke, Brill, Dittrich, Gundrum, Kurtz, Maxey, Murphy, Novak, O'Connor, Tusler, Wittke and Kaufert

  2. Mar 7, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Mar 13, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Wanggaard

  4. Mar 17, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Kitchens added as a cosponsor

  5. Mar 25, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1