Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Bill 231

Creating a tax credit for expenses related to film production services and for capital investments made by a film production company, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Topics: Amusement, Corporation: Taxation, Franchise: Taxation, Income tax: Credit, Legislative Audit Bureau, Tourism, Department of

Stopped before the full Senate voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 29, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 231. That version died when the session ended.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates income and franchise tax credits for film production companies and creates the State Film Office, attached to the Department of Tourism, to implement the tax credit accreditations and allocations. Under the bill, a film production company may claim a credit in an amount that is equal to 30 percent of the salary or wages paid to the company’s employees in the taxable year for services rendered in this state to produce a film, video, broadcast advertisement, or television production, as approved by the State Film Office, and paid to employees who were residents of this state at the time that they were paid. The total amount of the credits that may be claimed by a taxpayer may not exceed an amount that is equal to the first $250,000 of salary or wages paid to each of the taxpayer’s employees in the taxable year, not including the salary or wages paid to the taxpayer’s two highest-paid employees in the taxable year, for a production with budgeted expenditures of $1,000,000 or more. If the total amount of the credits claimed by a taxpayer exceeds the taxpayer’s tax liability, the state will not issue a refund, but the taxpayer may carry forward any remaining credit to subsequent taxable years.

Under the bill, a film production company may claim an income and franchise tax credit in an amount that is equal to 30 percent of the production expenditures paid by the company in the taxable year to produce a film, video, broadcast advertisement, or television production. If the total amount of the credits claimed by the company exceeds the company’s tax liability, the state will issue a refund.

Read the full summary

The bill also allows a film production company to claim an income and franchise tax credit, for the first three taxable years that the company is doing business in this state, in an amount that is equal to 30 percent of the amount that the claimant paid in the taxable year to purchase depreciable tangible personal property or to acquire, construct, rehabilitate, remodel, or repair real property.

Under the bill, a film production company may claim an income and franchise tax credit in an amount that is equal to the amount of sales and use taxes that the claimant paid for tangible personal property and taxable services that are used to produce a film, video, broadcast advertisement, or television production in this state.

The bill provides that the State Film Office may not allocate more than $10,000,000 in film production and investment tax credits in each fiscal year. The bill also requires the State Film Office to annually submit a report to the legislature that specifies the number of persons who submitted credit applications in the previous year and the amount of the credits allocated to each such applicant and to make recommendations on improving the efficiency of the program. Finally, the bill requires the Legislative Audit Bureau to biennially prepare a performance evaluation audit of the accreditation program implemented by the State Film Office.

Who's behind it

8 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

32 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 40 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (32)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Utilities vote on an amendment

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jun 3, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Utilities vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Jun 3, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 23, 2026

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 5, 2025 to Jun 10, 2025

    1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.

  3. Jun 3, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  4. Jun 3, 2025

    “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  5. May 20, 2025 to May 28, 2025

    3 more representatives and 1 senator signed on in support.

  6. May 20, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. May 19, 2025

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  8. May 19, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. May 16, 2025

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  10. May 16, 2025

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. May 7, 2025

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Apr 29, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Utilities and Tourism.

  13. Apr 29, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 29, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Bradley, Testin, Drake, Feyen, Larson, Pfaff, Quinn and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Armstrong, Callahan, Hurd, Brown, Doyle, Emerson, Goodwin, Green, Johnson, Kitchens, Kreibich, Maxey, Melotik, Miresse, Moses, Mursau, O'Connor, Prado, Snyder, Steffen, Swearingen, Tittl, Wichgers and Zimmerman

  2. Apr 29, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Utilities and Tourism

  3. May 7, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Fitzgerald added as a cosponsor

  4. May 16, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. May 16, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 16, 2025 · Senate

    Senator Habush Sinykin added as a coauthor

  7. May 19, 2025 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. May 19, 2025 · Senate

    Representatives Anderson and Stroud added as cosponsors

  9. May 20, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  10. May 20, 2025 · Senate

    Senator James added as a coauthor

  11. May 21, 2025 · Senate

    Representatives Udell and Subeck added as cosponsors

  12. May 22, 2025 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Bradley

  13. May 28, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Joers added as a cosponsor

  14. Jun 3, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  15. Jun 3, 2025 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  16. Jun 3, 2025 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Utilities, Technology and Tourism, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  17. Jun 3, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. Jun 5, 2025 · Senate

    Senator Ratcliff added as a coauthor

  19. Jun 10, 2025 · Senate

    Representative Bare added as a cosponsor

  20. Mar 23, 2026 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote