Senate Bill 449
Registers of deeds, transportation project plats, and providing a penalty. (FE)
Topics: Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Plats, Real property, Register of deeds, Transportation, Department of: Administration
Stopped before the full Senate voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. The last day for votes this session was Mar 19, 2026. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Sep 29, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 23, 2026: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 445. That version became law.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes various changes to the statutes governing the duties of a county register of deeds. Most of the changes clarify existing provisions or modernize or make minor changes to current statutory language. Most of these changes have no or very minor substantive effect. Several provisions of the bill, however, have greater substantive effect. These changes include the following:
1. Requires that a recorded document affecting real property identify the subject real property using one of several specified manners of land description.
Read the full summary Show less
2. Requires that a document recorded by the register include the date and time of recording. Current law requires that such a document include the date and time the document was received by the register.
3. Requires that a recorded document that references a previously recorded or filed document contain the document number of the referenced document.
4. Requires that a recorded assignment, partial release, or satisfaction relate to no more than one mortgage.
5. Includes requirements related to recording documents containing marked scrivener’s errors or corrections.
6. Prohibits recording documents that the register determines are not authorized to be recorded or that are being recorded for an unauthorized purpose.
7. Specifies certain format requirements for recorded documents, including the font size used on a document, the quality of images on a document, and the legibility of the names on a document.
8. Clarifies that a document substantially complies with recording format requirements if the document satisfies most of the format requirements specified in the statutes and recording the document will not impair the register’s ability to accurately record, reproduce, or index the document.
9. Eliminates exceptions to the format requirements for documents certified by governmental units, filed documents, and certain tax lien forms.
10. Changes the fee for recording a transportation plat from $25 to $30.
11. Allows a register to include, in a contract for copies of the register’s daily recording related to real property, a requirement that the contractor protect the identity and integrity of records obtained and a prohibition from selling or disseminating copies or images or data of the copies. Current law provides that a register may enter into these contracts but does not specify any contractual provisions.
12. Provides that any person who knowingly provides to a register for recording any false or forged document relating to a conveyance is guilty of a Class I felony.
13. Eliminates certain notices, including notice of certification of the recording of a common law trust and written notice of recording of a transportation plat.
14. Eliminates requirements related to the maintenance of specified bound volumes.
15. Defines “page” for the purpose of calculating the fees a register may charge for providing copies of documents.
16. Prohibits the recording of court documents that are not certified as the original document or a true and accurate copy of the document by the clerk of courts or register of probate of the county in which the court from which the document originated is located.
17. Allows a person to submit a copy of the most recent property tax bill for purposes of obtaining evidence of certain property interests of a decedent. Under current law, a person may obtain evidence that certain property interests of a decedent have been terminated by providing information to the register of deeds of the county in which the property is located. Currently, to obtain evidence that a decedent’s property interests in real property have been terminated, a person must submit to the register of deeds a copy of the property tax bill for the year preceding the year of the decedent’s death.
18. Requires a person to provide adequate postage as a condition of having documents left with the register of deeds returned or delivered to another person.
19. Allows the register of deeds to prohibit or otherwise limit the use of electronic devices in any area under the authority of the register of deeds.
The bill also changes requirements related to plats prepared as part of certain transportation projects. Under current law, a political subdivision or the Department of Transportation may submit certain transportation orders or resolutions in the form of a plat filed or recorded with the register of deeds. Current law specifies that such a plat must be a single sheet or a detail and a title sheet. This bill provides that such a plat may be up to four sheets of which the first must be a detail sheet and any others must be accompanying sheets.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.
Who's behind it
2 senators are its . All 2 are Republicans.
19 more lawmakers .
See all 21 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Jesse James · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (19)
- Elijah Behnke · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Fitzgerald · Democrat, Assembly
- Dean Kaufert · Republican, Assembly
- Karen Kirsch · Democrat, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Vinnie Miresse · Democrat, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jeff Mursau · Republican, Assembly
- Todd Novak · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez · Democrat, Assembly
- Lori Palmeri · Democrat, Assembly
- Jim Piwowarczyk · Republican, Assembly
- Lee Snodgrass · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Nancy VanderMeer · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 2, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 2, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 23, 2026
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 2, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Mar 2, 2026
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 12, 2026
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 24, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 13, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 6, 2025
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Sep 29, 2025
Sent to the Senate Committee on Transportation and Local Government.
-
Sep 29, 2025
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Sep 29, 2025 · Senate
Introduced by Senators James and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Krug, Kaufert, Knodl, Miresse, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, O'Connor, Piwowarczyk, Snodgrass, Subeck, Tittl, VanderMeer, Wichgers, Behnke, Kirsch, Fitzgerald and Palmeri
- Sep 29, 2025 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government
- Oct 6, 2025 · Senate
Representative Ortiz-Velez added as a cosponsor
- Oct 13, 2025 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 24, 2025 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 27, 2026 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator James
- Feb 12, 2026 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2026 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2026 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2026 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2026 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 23, 2026 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote