Senate Bill 480
Residential tax incremental districts. (FE)
Topics: Administration, Department of: Agency and general functions, Housing, Municipality: Taxation, Property tax, University of Wisconsin, Village: Taxation
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 9, 2026. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 2, 2025
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 11, 2026
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 19, 2026
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2025 Wisconsin Act 235
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 9, 2026: “Published 4-9-2026”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Embed this on your site
Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card
The same bill was also filed in the Assembly as AB 451. That version died when the session ended.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill allows cities and villages to designate tax incremental districts (TIDs) as residential TIDs, which under the bill would be subject to a different rule regarding the maximum equalized value of taxable property that may be contained in the TID than would apply to other TIDs.
TIF generally Under current law, cities and villages may use tax incremental financing (TIF) to encourage development in the city or village. In general, under TIF, a city or village pays for improvements in a TID and then collects tax moneys attributable to all taxing jurisdictions on the increased property value in the TID for a certain period of time to pay for the improvements. Ideally, after that period of time, the city or village will have been repaid for its initial investment and the property tax base in the TID will have permanently increased in value.
Read the full summary Show less
In general and in brief, a city or village makes use of TIF using the following procedure:
1. The city or village designates an area as a TID and creates a project plan laying out the expenditures that the city or village will make within the TID, and the designation and project plan are approved by representatives of the other taxing jurisdictions (joint review board).
2. The Department of Revenue establishes the “base value” of the TID. This value is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation.
3. Each year thereafter, the “value increment” of the property within the TID is determined by subtracting the base value from the current value of property within the TID. The portion of taxes collected on any positive value increment (the tax increment) is collected by the city or village for use solely for the project costs of the TID. Tax increments collected by the city or village include taxes that would have been collected by other taxing jurisdictions, such as counties or school districts, if the TID had not been created.
4. Tax increments are collected until the city or village has recovered all of its project costs or until the TID reaches its statutory termination date.
Residential TIDs This bill allows a city or village to create a residential TID. To create a residential TID, the local legislative body must adopt a resolution finding all of the following:
1. That all project costs of the TID are related to residential developments that satisfy certain limits related to type of residences developed, setbacks, lot sizes, and structure sizes.
2. That all project costs of the TID are for the construction or improvement of infrastructure necessary for residential development within the TID.
3. That all project costs of the TID will be paid directly from tax increments or financed by a developer.
Under current law, when creating a new TID or amending a TID, a city or village must make a finding that the equalized value of taxable property of the new or amended TID, plus the value increment of all existing TIDs in the city or village, does not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village.
Under this bill, a residential TID is not subject to this 12 percent rule. However, residential TIDs are subject to a separate, but similar 3 percent rule. That is, when creating a new residential TID or amending a residential TID, a city or village must make a finding that the equalized value of taxable property of the new or amended residential TID, plus the value increment of all existing residential TIDs in the city or village, does not exceed 3 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village.
Currently, a city or village generally may amend the project plan of a TID with the approval of the joint review board. Under this bill, with regard to a residential TID, a project plan may not be amended to increase the project costs of the TID later than 10 years before the unextended termination date of the TID except upon unanimous vote of the joint review board. The bill also specifies that a residential TID may not be a donor or recipient TID. That is, tax increments generated by the residential TID may not be used to pay project costs for another TID and tax increments generated by another TID may not be used to pay a residential TID’s project costs.
Because this bill may increase or decrease, directly or indirectly, the cost of the development, construction, financing, purchasing, sale, ownership, or availability of housing in this state, the Department of Administration, as required by law, will prepare a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.
Who's behind it
3 senators are its . All 3 are Republicans.
20 more lawmakers .
See all 23 names Hide the names
Authors (3)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Republican, Senate
- Dan Feyen · Republican, Senate
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (20)
- Dave Armstrong · Republican, Assembly
- Brent Jacobson · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Brienne Brown · Democrat, Assembly
- Dassler-Alfheim, Ratcliff and Spreitzer
- Barbara Dittrich · Republican, Assembly
- Jodi Emerson · Democrat, Assembly
- Joy Goeben · Republican, Assembly
- Joel Kitchens · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Kreibich · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Jerry O'Connor · Republican, Assembly
- Lori Palmeri · Democrat, Assembly
- Will Penterman · Republican, Assembly
- Amaad Rivera-Wagner · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Lee Snodgrass · Democrat, Assembly
- Rob Summerfield · Republican, Assembly
- Travis Tranel · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 7 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Insurance vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 23, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Insurance vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 23, 2025
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 0 · Feb 3, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 15 to 0 · Feb 3, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 30 to 3 · Feb 11, 2026
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (30)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Brad Pfaff (D, 32)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Cory Tomczyk (R, 29)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Eric Wimberger (R, 2)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jamie Wall (D, 30)
- Jeff Smith (D, 31)
- Jesse James (R, 23)
- Jodi Habush Sinykin (D, 8)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- Julian Bradley (R, 28)
- Kelda Roys (D, 26)
- Kristin Dassler-Alfheim (D, 18)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Melissa Ratcliff (D, 16)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rachael Cabral-Guevara (R, 19)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Sarah Keyeski (D, 14)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (3)
- Dora Drake (D, 4)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 90 to 5 · Feb 19, 2026 · 4 didn't vote
See how each of the 99 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (90)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Alex Dallman (R, 39)
- Alex Joers (D, 81)
- Amaad Rivera-Wagner (D, 90)
- Amanda Nedweski (R, 32)
- Andrew Hysell (D, 48)
- Angela Stroud (D, 73)
- Angelito Tenorio (D, 14)
- Ann Roe (D, 44)
- Barbara Dittrich (R, 99)
- Ben DeSmidt (D, 65)
- Ben Franklin (R, 88)
- Bob Donovan (R, 61)
- Bob Wittke (R, 63)
- Brent Jacobson (R, 87)
- Brienne Brown (D, 43)
- Calvin Callahan (R, 35)
- Chanz Green (R, 74)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Clint Anderson (D, 45)
- Clint Moses (R, 92)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dave Armstrong (R, 67)
- Dave Maxey (R, 83)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Dean Kaufert (R, 53)
- Deb Andraca (D, 23)
- Duke Tucker (R, 75)
- Elijah Behnke (R, 6)
- Greta Neubauer (D, 66)
- Gus Gustafson (R, 55)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jenna Jacobson (D, 50)
- Jerry O'Connor (R, 60)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Piwowarczyk (R, 98)
- Joan Fitzgerald (D, 46)
- Jodi Emerson (D, 91)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Joy Goeben (R, 5)
- Kalan Haywood (D, 16)
- Karen DeSanto (D, 40)
- Karen Hurd (R, 69)
- Karen Kirsch (D, 7)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Snodgrass (D, 52)
- Lindee Brill (R, 27)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Lori Palmeri (D, 54)
- Margaret Arney (D, 18)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Maureen McCarville (D, 42)
- Mike Bare (D, 80)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Melotik (R, 22)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Randy Udell (D, 47)
- Renuka Mayadev (D, 77)
- Rick Gundrum (R, 58)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Kreibich (R, 28)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Russell Goodwin (D, 12)
- Ryan Spaude (D, 89)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Sequanna Taylor (D, 11)
- Shae Sortwell (R, 2)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Shelia Stubbs (D, 78)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Supreme Moore Omokunde (D, 17)
- Sylvia Ortiz-Velez (D, 8)
- Tip McGuire (D, 64)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Tony Kurtz (R, 41)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Vinnie Miresse (D, 71)
- Will Penterman (R, 38)
No (5)
- Angelina Cruz (D, 62)
- Christian Phelps (D, 93)
- Darrin Madison (D, 10)
- Francesca Hong (D, 76)
- Ryan Clancy (D, 19)
Didn't vote (4)
- Joe Sheehan (D, 26)
- Priscilla Prado (D, 9)
- Robyn Vining (D, 13)
- Tara Johnson (D, 96)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE AS AMENDED”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 32 to 1 · Mar 17, 2026
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 9, 2026
The new law was published.
-
Apr 9, 2026
The governor signed it. It became 2025 Wisconsin Act 235.
-
Apr 2, 2026
Sent to the governor.
-
Mar 19, 2026
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Mar 17, 2026
“Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)
-
Mar 6, 2026 to Mar 17, 2026
1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.
-
Feb 23, 2026
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 19, 2026
The Assembly passed it too, 90 to 5.
-
Feb 19, 2026
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 18, 2026
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 12, 2026
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 11, 2026
3 more senators signed on in support.
-
Feb 11, 2026
The Senate passed it, 30 to 3.
-
Feb 11, 2026
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 3, 2026
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.
-
Feb 3, 2026
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Jan 29, 2026
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Oct 23, 2025
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 23, 2025
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 15, 2025
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 10, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 7, 2025
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 6, 2025
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 2, 2025
Sent to the Senate Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry.
-
Oct 2, 2025
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 2, 2025 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Feyen, Marklein and Cabral-Guevara; cosponsored by Representatives Armstrong, B. Jacobson, Brooks, Dittrich, Goeben, Kitchens, Knodl, Kreibich, Murphy, O'Connor, Penterman, Rivera-Wagner, Summerfield, Tranel and Palmeri
- Oct 2, 2025 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry
- Oct 6, 2025 · Senate
Representative Snodgrass added as a cosponsor
- Oct 7, 2025 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 10, 2025 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 15, 2025 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen
- Oct 15, 2025 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 23, 2025 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 23, 2025 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 23, 2025 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing, Rural Issues and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 23, 2025 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 29, 2026 · Senate
Withdrawn from committee on Senate Organization and rereferred to joint committee on Finance pursuant to Senate Rule 46(2)(c)
- Feb 3, 2026 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 3, 2026 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 3, 2026 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 3, 2026 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 6, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Feyen
- Feb 9, 2026 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-11-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 30, Noes 3
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Senators Dassler-Alfheim, Ratcliff and Spreitzer added as coauthors
- Feb 11, 2026 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 12, 2026 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Armstrong
- Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2026 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 12:09 PM on 2-19-2026 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 14
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 90, Noes 5
- Feb 19, 2026 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2026 · Senate
Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Mar 6, 2026 · Senate
Representative Brown added as a cosponsor
- Mar 16, 2026 · Senate
Placed on calendar 3-17-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Assembly Amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 1
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Senator Smith added as a coauthor
- Mar 17, 2026 · Senate
Action ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 19, 2026 · Senate
Representative Emerson added as a cosponsor
- Mar 20, 2026 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)
- Mar 20, 2026 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 20, 2026 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 2, 2026 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2026
- Apr 9, 2026 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-8-2026. 2025 Wisconsin Act 235
- Apr 9, 2026 · Senate
Published 4-9-2026
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote