Skip to content
Bills from the 2025–26 session

Senate Joint Resolution 2

Requiring photographic identification to vote in any election (second consideration)

Topics: Constitutional amendments: Second consideration, Elections: Ballots, Identification cards, Voting

Adopted

Both chambers adopted it, the second on Jan 14, 2025. A doesn't go to the governor.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 6, 2025

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 17 to 15

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 54 to 45

  5. Adopted, here now

    Resolutions end here.

Latest entry in the official record, May 20, 2025: “Published 5-20-2025. Enrolled Joint Resolution 1”

Read the proposal

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

Embed this on your site

Paste this code into your page. The card shows the latest record each time it loads. Preview the card

The same proposal was also filed in the Assembly as AJR 1. That version died when the session ended.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL This proposed constitutional amendment, to be given second consideration by the 2025 legislature for submittal to the voters in April 2025, was first considered by the 2023 legislature in 2023 Senate Joint Resolution 73, which became 2023 Enrolled Joint Resolution 9.

This constitutional amendment provides that a qualified elector may not vote in any election unless the elector presents photographic identification issued by this state, by the federal government, by a federally recognized American Indian tribe or band in this state, or by a college or university in this state, that verifies the elector’s identity. Acceptable forms of photographic identification must be specified by law. The amendment authorizes the legislature to pass laws establishing exceptions to the photographic identification requirement. Additionally, if an elector is unable to present valid photographic identification before voting on election day, the elector must be given the opportunity to cast a provisional ballot and present valid photographic identification at a later time and place, as provided by law.

Read the full summary

PROCEDURE FOR SECOND CONSIDERATION When a proposed constitutional amendment is before the legislature on second consideration, any change in the text approved by the preceding legislature causes the proposed constitutional amendment to revert to first consideration status so that second consideration approval would have to be given by the next legislature before the proposal may be submitted to the people for ratification [see joint rule 57 (2)].

If the legislature approves a proposed constitutional amendment on second consideration, it must also set the date for submitting the proposed constitutional amendment to the people for ratification and must determine the question or questions to appear on the ballot.

Who's behind it

18 senators are its ⁠. All 18 are Republicans.

51 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 69 names

Authors (18)

Signed on in support (51)

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this proposal.

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Jan 7, 2025

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 17 to 15 · Jan 8, 2025 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 54 to 45 · Jan 14, 2025

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (54)

No (45)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 20, 2025

    The new law was published.

  2. Jan 14, 2025

    The Assembly adopted it too, 54 to 45.

  3. Jan 9, 2025 to Jan 10, 2025

    4 more representatives signed on in support.

  4. Jan 8, 2025

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  5. Jan 8, 2025

    The Assembly received it.

  6. Jan 8, 2025

    The Senate adopted it, 17 to 15.

  7. Jan 7, 2025

    The committee voted to recommend adopting it, 5 to 3.

  8. Jan 7, 2025

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Jan 6, 2025

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  10. Jan 6, 2025

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 6, 2025 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wanggaard, Bradley, Cabral-Guevara, Felzkowski, Feyen, Hutton, Jacque, Jagler, James, Kapenga, Marklein, Nass, Quinn, Stafsholt, Testin, Tomczyk, Wimberger and LeMahieu; cosponsored by Representatives Snyder, Donovan, Allen, Armstrong, August, Behnke, Born, Brooks, Callahan, Dallman, Dittrich, Duchow, Goeben, Green, Gundrum, Gustafson, Hurd, B. Jacobson, Kitchens, Knodl, Kreibich, Krug, Maxey, Melotik, Moses, Murphy, Mursau, Nedweski, Neylon, Novak, O'Connor, Penterman, Petersen, Piwowarczyk, Sortwell, Spiros, Steffen, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tittl, Tucker, Tusler, Vos, Wichgers, Wittke, Zimmerman, Kaufert, Rodriguez and Kurtz

  2. Jan 6, 2025 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Jan 7, 2025 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 7, 2025 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 7, 2025 · Senate

    Report adoption recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  6. Jan 7, 2025 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  7. Jan 7, 2025 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-8-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  8. Jan 8, 2025 · Senate

    Read a second time

  9. Jan 8, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Jan 8, 2025 · Senate

    Rules suspended to give joint resolution its third reading

  11. Jan 8, 2025 · Senate

    Read a third time and adopted, Ayes 17, Noes 15

  12. Jan 8, 2025 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Jan 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  14. Jan 8, 2025 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  15. Jan 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Representatives Franklin, Brill and Tranel added as cosponsors

  16. Jan 9, 2025 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-14-2025 by Committee on Rules

  17. Jan 10, 2025 · Assembly

    Representative VanderMeer added as a cosponsor

  18. Jan 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  19. Jan 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Jan 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Jan 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Jan 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 54, Noes 45

  23. Jan 14, 2025 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Jan 14, 2025 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  25. Jan 14, 2025 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  26. Feb 18, 2025 · Senate

    Deposited in the office of the Secretary of State on 2-18-2025

  27. May 20, 2025 · Senate

    Published 5-20-2025. Enrolled Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Joint resolution

A measure both chambers pass that doesn't go to the governor, such as a schedule or an honor.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Joint resolution

A measure both chambers pass that doesn't go to the governor, such as a schedule or an honor.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote